The Year in Reading: 2025

I always look forward to these little roundups — despite the work — because they give me the opportunity to get a meta-view on the stuff I’m putting in my brain. Reading and dreaming are similar for me, in a way: my conscious self is only rarely driving my choices. I can certainly try to assign myself reading, but the me that exists in the half hour between when I climb into bed and fall asleep is going to read what she’s going to read; ditto for the me on my commute. So last year was my rompy space opera year, the year before was the Year of Martha Wells, and the one before that the Year of Seanan McGuire.

This year was a little harder to categorize. I went back and read a lot of paranormal romance from the heyday: specifically, all of the Twilight Saga and the fifteen or so novels in the first “season” of Nalini Singh’s Psy-Changeling series. I also accidentally read five of Olivia Dade’s novels. I read a little more than a hundred books in 2025, so this is roughly a quarter of my reading. I also read a bunch of books with heists, almost all of them novellas or short stories, and continued reading rompy space opera at a much slower pace. Also, I read a lot of zombie books, per usual, because I don’t have a problem, I have a solution. Which is zombies, apparently.

So without further ado, my year in reading:

Zombies:

I’ll start with zombies because the year starts with zombies in Zombruary. This Zombruary was a little lackluster — frankly, I had a brutal depressive episode — but I’m always going to get to several more throughout the year. As usual, the books are a mix: some from the zombie heyday maybe 10-15 years ago which tend to be pretty classic outbreak-and-seige stories, and some more recent, are often more oblique, coming at zombies in odd ways. While generally I prefer the weird stuff to the more Romero-rules narratives, this year I dug the pleasures of the more classic zombie story. Which is to say, I didn’t think some of the more radical experiments worked, though I still enjoyed the attempt.

Revival by Tim Seeley, et al. I first started reading this comic series in 2013 when they were coming out in weekly (monthly?) installments, but, per usual, I wandered off maybe halfway through. I have a pretty serious problem finishing series, even the ones I like, so it was satisfying to go back and read the entire eight volume run from start to finish. The events in Revival are precipitated by a single event: on one day in Wausau, WI, all of the people who died that day get back up. These reanimated people aren’t cannibal shamblers, and the reanimation does not appear to be contagious. Although the setting, art style and dialogue is naturalistic, there’s an edge of the supernatural: rural noir, Midwestern Gothic. The twenty-odd revivers (that the authorities know about) are … mostly normal, but there’s an uncanniness that creeps. The town is quarantined and beset by various federal agencies, and there’s a fair amount of tension between the local podunk bullshit and the high-handed federal bullshit, in addition to the various bullshits of small time dealers, religious hucksters, and opportunistic attention whores.

I absolutely adore the Midwestern setting, and I feel like Seeley et al did a damn fine job of speaking the language of my people, one that relies on understatement and lacuna more often than is wise. While there were some episodes I didn’t enjoy — I thought the change of venue to NYC didn’t quite work in one of the middle volumes — the series has a more than satisfying ending, even if it got a little more operatic that I prefer at points. With a series of this nature, there isn’t ever a single protagonist, or the town is the protagonist. That said, the character of Em, a hidden reviver who basically has to solve her own murder, comes the closest. I really liked the way Em’s story wrapped up — really, the only way that could satisfy — and the decision not to punish the revealed villain with more than natural consequences was a good one.

American Rapture by C.J. Leede. My one-line review was “read the trigger warnings” because these zombies are seriously fucking upsetting. Zombies are generally understood as creatures of appetite, with the urge to consume decoupled from any moderating force. Now do that, but with sexual hunger in addition to the regular kind. Now do that, but have your religiously repressive parents get infected, so you have to run from the house or be attacked by your own father. Though these sexual assaults by the infected aren’t ever described gratuitously, it’s possible that’s worse, letting my imagination do the work of conjuring horror. The themes of the novel center on repressive fundy Christianity in the American Midwest — the title is an indicator — and Leede does an excellent job of sense of place. Like Revival, American Rapture takes place all through central Wisconsin: there’s a memorable sequence in House on the Rock, and I think the main character even passes through Wausau, where the events of Revival take place. Definitely thought about this one long after I finished reading.

Until the End of the World and So Long, Lollipops by Sarah Lyons Fleming. This series was published a dozen or so years ago in the zombie heyday, and it shows. Until the End of the World is pretty straightforward: a group of survivors escape from a zombifying NYC, and strike out to the main character’s parents house in the woods. A lot of people have tagged this as YA, which isn’t accurate but I can see why they do it. There’s a lot of petulant teen behavior that has no place in the zombie apocalypse, nevermind that everyone is in their late 20s. I did like the fact that our main character had been raised by preppers, so she legit knew what she was doing, and knew how hard it was to grow food and have safe water. The book drags because of it though, as there’s a lot of page time of garden tending and the like, so I’m apparently praising and dinging this book for the same thing. So Long, Lollipops is a sidequel novella, and while it was interesting to see what happened to that one guy, it’s def not standalone.

Dating After the End of the World by Jeneva Rose. Dating After the End of the World has more than a few character and plot beats in common with Until the End of the World, weirdly. The main character has to make it out with from a zombifying major metro to head to her parent’s prepper compound, whereupon she settles into some juvenile in-fighting with people who should be old enough to know better, until they’re attacked by a post-apocalyptic gang. I enjoyed Dating After the End more for a couple reasons. The fight scenes are better and they’re a lot gorier, which I thought was interesting for a book which is romance-adjacent. While the romantic pair had just the most cringe banter, the emotional background of the other main players was good, I thought. Dad became a prepper because of the very traumatic death of his wife, and the emotional fallout of that has worn pretty deep grooves in all of their lives. I also liked the ending, which might be a cliffhanger, or might just be really funny.

What Moves the Dead by T. Kingfisher. Maybe tagging this is as a zombie book is a bit of a spoiler, but I think you know pretty quickly that some serious fuckshit is happening with the uncanny rabbits. What Moves the Dead is a riff on The Fall of the House of Usher, and, like the Poe story, the novel follows the person come to visit the Ushers, in this case a soldier from an invented central European country. Per usual, Kingfisher’s narrator is funny and sly and entertaining, and the events more creeping dread and occult weirdness than bloodbath or cruelty. Tbh, I just didn’t connect to this one like I have with Kingfisher’s other horror. There were some nice bits — I am always down for some sporror, for example — but the overall tone bordered on flippant, which I don’t think works in Gothic horror so well. Not bad at all, just not quite for me.

Bloody Sunrise by Gwendolyn Harper. Honestly, if this hadn’t been an insomnia read, I might not have enjoyed it as much. Bloody Sunrise is a straightforward road trip through the zombie apocalypse, up to and including a pretty jaundiced view of human nature. The MMC was pitched to me as having Pedro Pascal vibes, which is kinda accurate, but also it’s tough to capture Pascal’s specific dorky delights on the page. I also didn’t love how this ends on a serious cliffhanger. I fully expected this to be published ten years before it was in that weird period when everyone was serializing everything, because it feels like an installment in a serialized novel. (Basically the only writers I’ll accept this from are Karen Marie Moning — grudgingly — or Mira Grant.) So was this amazing? No. Will I quit reading this series in a huff? Also no. 

The Z Word by Lindsay King-Miller. The pitch on this one made it seem right up my alley: a disaster bisexual has to ride out the beginnings of the zombie apocalypse perpetrated by the corporate sponsor of Pride weekend in a small town in Arizona. Oh, and her ex-girlfriend was working with the sponsor, so the ex is either a patsy or a collaborator. I’m into the criticism of corporate bullshit co-opting queerness as cynical “branding,” but it wasn’t very coherent here in the end. The tonal swerve between pulp and something like realism didn’t work for me either. Fwiw, I think Eat Your Heart Out (a zombie novel I read for last Zombruary) by Kelly deVos manages a similar sort of cultural criticism — with zombies! — in a much more adroit way. 

Zomromcom by Olivia Dade. Zomromcom is just what it says on the tin: a romantic comedy … with zombies! The romantic comedy part of the story worked for me, the zombie part less so. But I was in the mood for this kind of quippy goofiness, so I had a good time anyway. I also enjoyed the romantic pair. The vampire love interest is openly bisexual, but more than that, he’s also pretty femme. He has a fashion and makeup insta, and he’s more than a little vain about his dashing good looks. I don’t think you run into many femme bi men in mainstream romance, or even in not-mainstream romance. Edie is kind of a dingdong, which is pretty common for romcom heroines, but it never tips over into suicidal stupidity or clueless cruelty. (I’m just a sol bean who can’t help getting people killed being a dumbass uwu. This sort of thing happens a lot in zombie stories.) I get the impression this is the start of a series, and I’m into it.

Awakened by Laura Elliott. Thea Chares lives in the Tower of London with a skeleton crew of medical staff, engineers, and a couple other folk, people who were instrumental in developing a neural implant that would eliminate a person’s need for sleep. After the neural chip was widely adopted, something catastrophic happened with the programming of the chip, a shift which basically turned everyone into ravening monsters. Thea and her band of survivors while away their time trapped in the Tower half-assedly trying to come up with a cure and in-fighting, a tenuous status quo that is unsettled when they take in two survivors: a pregnant human woman, and a preternaturally self-composed one of the Sleepless. The plot of the novel, insofar as there is one, is pretty episodic. Awakened is laid out in an almost epistolary format, narrated by Thea. While this sort of musing, literary take on the zombie apocalypse usually makes me freak out, cf. It Lasts Forever and Then It’s Over by Anne de Marcken, another Zombrurary book I read last year, Awakened never quite clicked for me, and that despite some really great writing. Alas.

This Dark Earth by John Hornor Jacobs. I sort of fell into reading this again when I finished reading Jacobs’s most recent novel, The Night That Finds Us All, and wanted it to keep going. His writing is so fucking good. I read this when it came out, and even wrote a long review back when I did such things. I don’t necessarily have much to add to it, other than I really, really appreciate Jacobs’s attention to detail. This Dark Earth was the first of his novels I’d read, but as I’ve read down his oeuvre, I can tell how much research he puts into his books, but it doesn’t come out in a showy, flashy way. The doctor in This Dark Earth speaks both casually and professionally about the symptoms the infected exhibit — this looks like such-and-such syndrome, but that only affects people with a Y chromosome, wtf, &c — but it never turns into a lecture. I totally get the impulse to show off when you’ve done some good research, and the restraint Jacobs shows while still clearly knowing what he’s talking about is dope as hell. Hail to the king, baby.

Southern Reach by Jeff Vandermeer

I ended up listening to the entire Southern Reach series — original trilogy Annihilation, Authority, Acceptance, and the more recently published Absolutionbecause while I’ve read all four books before, I tore through them so fast that the mechanics of the plot didn’t register, other than a few bright, terrible moments. So the full impact of creeping dread punctuated by terrifying reveals was largely intact, hoorah. I had virtually no memory of Acceptance, for example, which became a problem when I read Absolution; there’s a lot of lore. The novels deal with an eldritch anomaly called Area X on the Forgotten Coast of Florida — something like a pocket universe crossed with a dreamscape. A governmental body called the Southern Reach has the administration of Area X as its mandate, such as it is. Vandermeer plays with storytelling styles, tropes, narrative voices, perspective, and so on, all in the service of some of the most quietly unsettling shit put to paper.

While I really don’t care what the explanation for Area X’s existence or behavior is — that does not matter to the viscera of the narrative — I did find myself thinking about the reader’s perception of Area X. So much of what we know is filtered through the Southern Reach, and the institutional wisdom of the SR is … institutional. All the spy machinations and siloing leads to paranoia, and that’s not even getting into Lowry’s arachnid fuckshit at the center of things. While a lot of horrible stuff happens to our characters, this time through I experienced the ending on the original trilogy this as almost a somulant letting go, the sleeper’s hand opening as dreams pull them under. 

A note on the audio: I wouldn’t have expected it from an actor I associate with 80s sitcoms and the asshole character in TV movies, but holy wow is Bronson Pinchot’s voice acting excellent. (Carolyn McCormick was lovely too, but I didn’t have preconceived notions about her.)

The Twilight Saga by Stephenie Meyer

Back in my Goodreads days, that site basically ran on Twilight reviews. I read Twilight at that time and then decided to be done with the series. But then I ended up reading Breaking Dawn because I’d been told Breaking Dawn was relevant to my interests (which it was.) Though this is reductive, the first three Twilight novels each misread a work of classic literature: Twilight alludes to Pride & Prejudice; New Moon gets Romeo & Juliet wrong; and Eclipse makes an absolute hash of Wuthering Heights. The mistaken asshole plot of P&P is so ubiquitous in romance that it doesn’t set me off, but I have a whole thing about R&J and an even bigger one about Wuthering Heights, so I knew it was best that I stay away. Anyway, this year ended up being the year that I read the entire Twilight Saga, including the gender-flipped version she put out for the 10 year anniversary. I did not read Midnight Sun, however, because everyone I know who read it says it was trash.

Twilight. I don’t have much to say about this one that I haven’t already said. I’ll just note that Meyer does do an excellent job invoking the absolute cringiest parts of adolescence, which is one of those good news/bad news situations. Well done! But now I’ve broken out in hives.

New Moon. Meyer’s depiction of depression is decent, like the run of blank pages used to signify her catatonia. Bella’s emotional emptiness and feelings of flatness resonated with me as well; depression can be numb instead of painful. However, having only seen the movies before, I was a little taken aback by how much book Jacob sucks. Like seriously, fuck that guy. And the Romeo & Juliet intertext is so much more pronounced in book New Moon, which isn’t a good thing: Meyer doesn’t have the best sense of what makes that work tick. (Spoiler: they have to die at the end.) So she does things like have both Edward and Bella profess they believe they are dreaming for pages and pages, which, in addition to being super embarrassing, also makes them look like ninnies.

Eclipse. In some ways Eclipse is better than New Moon — considerably more happens and the action sequence is well written — but Jacob Black is such a date rape piece of shit that, as a whole, the book is considerably worse. Also, Meyer gets everything wrong in the Wuthering Heights intertext: neither of those dipshits Edward nor Jacob can hold a candle to the majestic swath of fucking destruction Heathcliff wreaks in Brontë’s novel, and Bella doesn’t have anywhere near Cathy’s incandescent cruelty. I thought the Romeo & Juliet thing in New Moon was misguided, but at least R & J were teenage dumbasses, so same. On the other hand, the fact that Bella has to get into a sleeping bag with Jacob or she’ll freeze to death was hilarious, and I admire using such a hoary old chestnut without a hint of embarrassment. On the level that these novels work, they work because they are utterly, perfectly earnest. I know that sounds like a dig, but it isn’t. While these books aren’t my own personal heroin, I can see why so many people love them.

The Short Second Life of Bree Tanner. Maybe it was the mood I was in when I read Bree Tanner, but I thought it was so delightfully goofy. Bree was the newborn vampire that Carlisle spared at the end of Eclipse but the Volturi killed anyway, and this is her first-person account of the last maybe two weeks before her death. Victoria and Riley, who were responsible for creating this newborn army, let the new vampires believe they couldn’t go into the sun, so all the new vamps end up stuck in the basement every night. Apparently, that many vampires in one place is going to end in lots of fights, and I was so amused by how many people got their arms ripped off — don’t worry, it’s bloodless and they reattach them. At one point, Riley throws someone’s own arms chunks at him lol. Anyway, I enjoyed the tone of Bree Tanner because Bree does so much less moaning and bitching than Bella. 

Breaking Dawn. Like Twilight, I’ve already spilled more than enough ink on Breaking Dawn. I’ll just note that I didn’t have quite as strong a reaction to the horrific birthing sequence this time around, I think because I’m farther from my own horrific birthing experience with the older kid. That said, that is still one of the most disturbing depictions of pregnancy and childbirth put to paper. And in a freaking YA novel! Shudder.

Life and Death. Stephenie Meyer was so hurt by critics pointing out how weird and creepy she treats gender in the series — recall that multiple grown-ass men imprint on female infants, for just one disturbing example — that she wrote a whole gender-flipped version of Twilight. (Imprinting is a sort of one-sided soul mate bond, because women don’t imprint back.) And she doesn’t just flip the genders of Edward and Bella, here named Edythe and Beaufort (lol), she flips everyone’s gender, except for Charlie and Renee, weirdly.

The book is somehow both hilarious and tedious. It’s beat for beat with Twilight, down to identical dialogue in some places, which gets really old. But it also shows how horrifically bad she is at writing men, especially in the first person (which, I’m given to understand, is one of the many things wrong with Midnight Sun.) She inadvertently proves her critics’ points: absolutely none of the procreative terror and female-coded “protective” magic works if Bella is Beau, and the whole love triangle with Jacob/Julie doesn’t work if she can’t imprint her way out of it. But the whole thing is so utterly bonkers that I ended up having a good time anyway. Shrug emoticon.

Cities! Cities! Cities!

There are many things I adore in fiction: the post-apocalyptic mall, functioning sff bureaucracies, zombies, &c. Pretty high on the list is vibrant, complicated, fucked up cities. Like the kind of cities that have neighborhoods and aren’t a bare boards play set for the characters, but a character in and of itself. This year was really good for that.

The Rivers of London series by Ben Aaronovich. I’ve been listening my way through this series for the last couple years. I absolutely adore the architecture- and history-nerd stuff that’s all over this series, plus the reader for the audiobooks, Kobna Holdbrook-Smith, is so godamn good at all the accents, inflections, and innuendos of the languages of London, the UK, and all of its denizens. While I like Peter Grant, the first person narrator of this series, London itself is the beating heart of every book. I lived in London briefly in the late 90s, and while I’m not going to pretend I know shit about shit, I do know it’s a freaking cool place, a messy amalgam of Roman forts, Renaissance city design, post-War Brutalist infill, and a dozen small towns swallowed by urbanity, layered over with waves of fires, bombings, and gentrification. God save the queen, &c.

  • The Furthest Station. A novella set between the fifth and sixth books, something something ghosts on the Tube. I admit I’m not the most attentive when I’m listening on my commute, so I kind of have no idea how we got from ghosts to an abducted lady. General confusion aside, I love the reader and I love Peter, the main character’s voice, so I don’t even care.
  • The Hanging Tree. The sixth novel. This one was a little mythology-heavy, which which is kind of an issue because I’m a little hazy on some of the mythos, and also it seemed to crimp the more procedural aspects of the plot. One of these things is my fault, the other less so. Anyway, this novel is the one where the Faceless Man, something of a series antagonist, is unmasked (wocka wocka), and he’s somehow both politely charming and terrifying, which is a good mix. He reminds me of this video I saw once of protesters at the home of the CEO of Nestle — a corporation which is about as evil as it comes — being drawn in so completely by his avuncular politeness that they disburse. That’s what the devil looks like.
  • Lies Sleeping. The seventh installment. We finally get a showdown between Leslie and Peter, and it’s really good. I — and I think Peter — always kind of thought that even though she went to the dark side, Leslie wasn’t completely on the dark side. This was inaccurate! Yikes. I do like that Peter seems to be getting out of policing, because while policework is an easy way to have your characters trot around the city and meet all kinds of folk, the Met police are horrifically corrupt assholes, and anything that doesn’t acknowledge that amounts to copaganda.

Dead Things by Stephen Blackmoore. Maybe cheating a little because urban fantasy is gonna urban. Dead Things felt old school in a lot of ways: the story is one of those dude comes back after a dozen years or so cos something super shitty happened, and then the reunions range from awkward to horrific. Add in a John Constantine-ish magic user and an intimate understanding of LA, and you have some rollicking mid-2010s urban fantasy. Also the main character swears a lot. +1

The City in the Middle of the Night by Charlie Jane Anders. Good gravy, this was so far up my alley it was out the other side: not one, not two, but three cities which run on their own mix of ideology and blarney, like cities do. The setting is an alien planet close to inhospitable to human life: it’s one of those tidally-locked ribbon worlds with a side of eternal darkness and one of burning light; plus a whole fucktonne of generational trauma from the generation ship that brought them to said planet.

The City in the Middle of the Night is often mentioned in the same breath as Le Guin’s The Dispossessed, which makes a lot of sense. There are two main cultures with maybe not opposed but disparate ideologies, and the cli-fi angle is pretty front and center. Anders does gets down into the streets of how groups of people — how cities — define themselves and then enforce that definition, a messiness that makes The City in the Middle of the Night feels less didactic than The Dispossessed (which is not meant to be a criticism of either, but an observation). The City in the Middle of the Night is jam-packed with ideas and cultures and just cool stuff and I fucking loved it.  

The Tomb of Dragons by Katherine Addison. This is the third (final?) installment in the Cemeteries of Amalo series, which is set in the world of The Goblin Emperor. The main character, Thara Calahar, is a Witness for the Dead, a calling which is something like a magical coroner. He was grievously injured fighting an evil ghost thing last book — basically he loses access to the ability that makes him a Witness — so he begins The Tomb of Dragons even more hangdog and morose than he usually is (complementary). While I enjoyed the more procedural parts of the novel and I’m happy to get Thara’s backstory, I wasn’t all that satisfied with how things end up between Thara and Iana; basically their slow-burn relationship fizzles out and Thara ends up romantically involved with some rando. I genuinely do not understand that choice at all. But! Amalo, in addition to being a great city, also has just tons of bureaucracy, which makes me happy.

The City We Became and The World We Make by N.K. Jemisin. I kind of don’t want to make this comparison because fuck Neil Gaiman, but the supernatural mechanic in Jemisin’s urban fantasy duology isn’t so far from American Gods: once cities reach a certain complexity in their identities, they become alive. That consciousness is then embodied in (usually) a single person. São Paulo is a character, for example. When New York comes to be, it is embodied in six avatars: one for each of the five boroughs, and a sixth who is the entirety of NYC. The first novel details the six trying to come together, while being thwarted at every turn by a eldritch horror personified by the Woman in White. (She’s a city too, but one of those Lovecraftian jobs.) (Also, the reader of the audio, Robin Miles, should totally get together with Kobna Holdbrook-Smith from the Rivers of London series and create the most perfect audio reader; both navigate dozens of accents and dialects with aplomb.)

I loved the first book, which showcases Jemisin’s typically smart prose & deft character sketches, but the second is where things really get interesting. Judging from the pub dates, these novels were written during Trump 1 and the Biden interregnum, and it shows. Lots of urban fantasy minces around, taking place in some ahistorical no-time; The World We Make does not. The overt plot details a mayoral race between a Make New York Great Again asshole and one of our avatars. Reading this right after Zorhan Mamdani’s defeat of that grandma-killing sexual-assaulting piece of garbage Andrew Cuomo was very cool; Mamdani could honestly be one of Jemisin’s avatars, and Cuomo has more than a little in common with the MNYGA candidate. We live in dark times, but New York abides.

Heists! Murder! Mystery!

I’m going to throw together a bunch of books under this broad category because I feel like it. Also they sort of occupy the same part of my brain.

How to Steal a Galaxy and Last Chance to Change the World by Beth Revis. I know it’s not fair that I read How to Steal a Galaxy during a rolling coup of the American government, but: the antagonist, a trillionaire obviously modeled after Elon Musk, is evil because he’s built planned obsolescence into his technology. In real life, Musk’s evil goes significantly harder than that. Feels like a failure of imagination. But our heroine also thinks the government is bad because … I’m not entirely sure — they won’t do things the way she likes? Also, freedom fighters are bad because they all employ suicide bombers or something. Our only solution is a wiseass thief, a woman working alone. I don’t think the message of “only Ada can save us” is all that great, because I know for a fact mutual aid is the only way we’re getting through this. Look, I know this is unfair the ding this lighthearted space heist for [gestures at everything], but it’s just the bad timing of history.

Last Chance to Change the World is a perfectly cromulent ending to the trilogy (if indeed it’s an ending.) Ada and Rian end up back on Earth, to pull a reverse heist of sorts: they’re trying to reprogram the climate-cleaning nanobots that the evil Musk-like trillionaire has designed to fail at an important and expensive moment. I’m a huge fan of how Ada uses mutual aid to achieve her goals, alleviating one of my criticisms of the series, though I’m less of a fan of Rian’s cop nonsense. He’s a cop, Ada, c’mon. She keeps her eyes on the prize tho, which is not capitulating to a badge who’s more obsessed with bringing a woman who hurt his ego to justice, instead of destroying the stupid and evil rich asshole who is willing to let a whole planet rot for more money. Money which he doesn’t need, of course. Relatable content.

Run with The Hunted by Jennifer R Donohue. I read Donohue’s witchy Hamlet retelling, Exit Ghost, last year, which was fucking fantastic. So I thought I’d try her cyberpunk heist novellas, which I think are eight or nine and counting. The main character has Ada Lamarr from Full Speed to a Crash Landing vibes — which is the first in the Beth Revis series above — but even girlier, which I like. (I have a whole thing about how heroines aren’t allowed to be girly, like if you wear dresses and know how to match your shoes to your lipstick you can’t be a real badass. This is bullshit.) A good outing, but I’m sure I’ll get more out of the next now that I know who’s who.

Murder on the Titania and Other Steam-Powered Adventures by Alex Acks. Fun collection of rompy steampunk short stories, most of which involve murder and/or a heist. The setting is an alt-America which has been divided into duchies; also there are airships and zombies. Acks has a light touch with exposition, which I honestly appreciate, but I also wanted so much more information on the zombie situation. (I admit this is a me thing.)

Death by Silver by Amy Griswold & Melissa Scott. A consulting detective and a metaphysician are hired by one of their bullies from public school (the British kind) to figure out who killed his father in a steampunky Victorian England. The alchemist and detective, Mathey and Lynes, were lovers in school and have something of a situationship going on. I loved the magic system because while it was clear the authors had worked it all out, they didn’t show off or bore you with a primer. And they took into account how useful skills — like cooking, or sewing, or magic — are expressed differently by class, gender, or culture. The pace felt deliberately slow, which I think is an interesting choice, but sometimes I felt like I didn’t need to get all the details of their transport about London and such. I admit I’m not much a mystery person though, and I suspect some of this might be convention, giving the reader a sense of place or the layers of society and class. I plan to read the next.

All of Us Murderers by KJ Charles. Kind of an odd mix of Knives Out and Northanger Abbey: a family of assholes is bidden to the family manse out on the moors in order to determine who will inherit the ill-gotten family wealth. Our protagonist is the youngest son who is utterly uninterested in both the wealth and what he’d have to do to get it, namely marrying a cousin from the wrong side of the blanket. (It’s Edwardian England; that’s not so odd.) There’s a lot of fun Gothic trappings and potentially supernatural shenanigans, though I think most readers can identify a Scooby Doo haunting pretty quickly. In fact, I was having a perfectly lovely time up until the third act when it was revealed how truly horrible this family is/was. One of the keys to Gothic, I think, is a sense of comedy that never lets on that it’s funny. There is a fair amount of humor, but in the end, everyone was so awful that humor was well and truly shattered. When it was fun it was fun, but when it wasn’t it was still ok. 

The Supersonic Phallus by Steven Key Meyers. I admit I downloaded this from Netgalley because of the title, obviously. As the title indicates, though this novel has some sword fighting, The Supersonic Phallus is not a romance novel. Nor is it a comedy, somehow? Two cub reporters are sent to investigate reports of UFOs in a small town in Colorado in 1947, same year as the Roswell crash. The narrator has a wife and a kid and another one on the way, while his counterpart is much more obviously queer-coded. They begin a largely unspoken affair while Scooby Doo sleuthing their way to the truth of the unidentified aircraft. The Supersonic Phallus felt like a historical fable, but it also put me in mind of The X-Files, oddly. This is neither a tragedy nor a comedy, though it is both rueful and funny in equal measures, which is a very complicated tone and one I don’t feel like I encounter often.

Otherworldly: Ghosts! Vampires! Demons! Magic!

Collected fantasy novels, in various modes. Some are high fantasy, some urban fantasy, some Gothic, some set in unique fantasy worlds. I spent some time trying to find a haunting that felt like the ghost stories my mother has collected for decades, but I never did. I suppose this is because actual ghost stories can be chilling, but they’re also usually discrete, something that happens to the house’s occupants a couple times but doesn’t ultimately affect their lives all that much. I had a good time anyway. I’m also tossing in some vamps, demons, and even a little cthulhu as a treat.

The Other Wind by Ursula K Le Guin. Last year I read through all the Earthsea books, but technically didn’t finish The Other Wind, the sixth and final installment, until early 2025. The Other Wind, more than anything, feels like Le Guin breaking her wand. Made me cry.

Black Hellebore by Grace Draven. Grace Draven’s Wraith Kings series starts as a really thoughtful slow-burn romantasy between a couple in a political marriage in Radiance — a book I love and reread every year — but then plays with various fantasy modes: doomed company on a quest, court intrigue, even a mermaid tale. Black Hellebore feels like a set up for dealing with the fallout from mess at the end of Eidolon, the second novel. But then also some stuff happened in Black Hellebore that freaked me out so bad I had to read the last page to make sure. It turns out, sort of, if you’re worried too. I also reread Master of Crows by Draven, which is about a powerful mage who is also a subsistence farmer, which is the coolest thing. You can’t eat magic.

A Fae in Finance by Juliet Brooks. This is another book I actually wrote a review for. Short form review: corporate drone Miri gets stuck in Fairyland, where she has to continue being a corporate drone. There’s lots of bureaucracy, send-ups of corporate culture, and hijinks involving cats, all of which I very much enjoy.

Moonflow by Bitter Karella. I first encountered Bitter Karella in the web series (is that what this is?) called The Midnight Society, which is a bit that started on Twitter wherein various horror writers sit around talking about stuff. It’s funnier than it sounds, promise. Anyway, when I learned their first novel was going to be published, I pre-ordered the shit out of it. It did not disappoint. Moonflow is extremely goopy sporror which is somehow gross, hilarious, and horrifying all at once.

Small Miracles by Olivia Atwater. It was when I saw that the pub date for this was 2022 that I realized that this is a Covid book in the vein of Legends & Lattes: low-stakes fantasy that is sweet, full of baked goods, and gently — not broadly — comedic. Most reviews note the Good Omens vibes, which I get. The main character is a fallen angel whose purview is minor temptations; she’s not going to damn you, just get you to take the last cookie. He ends up in a deal with an angel to tempt a woman who is so virtuous — largely due to crushing feelings of obligation to her dead sister’s child — that she’s grinding herself down. (I did a pronoun switch because angels are genderqueer, and Gadriel switches sexes regularly.) It’s not quippy, which I like, more gently slapstick with some minor theological jokes. So. Not going to blow your mind, but a nicely affirming little story. Enjoyable.

The Undermining of Twyla and Frank by Megan Bannen. I read the first of this series last year for Zombruary, but this one doesn’t have zombies in it. I felt this one in my bones. Twyla and Frank are both marshals who patrol Tanria, which is like a national park and a pocket universe had a baby. They’re both in their 50s with grown children, Twyla widowed and Frank divorced. They’ve been best friends for going on a dozen years. Things start to get messy when Frank has a baby dragon imprint on him — not unlike what happens in Robin McKinley’s Dragonhaven — and gets stuck in Tanria with a toff draconologist for a bit. Their relationship becomes strained when she goes on a date with said toff, the first one she’s gone on since the death of her husband. 

The way Twyla reflexively cares for everyone while also sometimes seething with resentment for the thoughtless ways she’s sometimes used by her family reeeeaally got to me. The hot flashes, the utterly necessary sensible shoes, the way you sometimes pee a little when you sneeze: I felt seen in ways I haven’t in a long while. Which is not to say Twyla is mistreated or her family sucks or anything — far from it — it’s just the quiet needs of a lot of menopausal women are often backburnered and then never seen to at all. Jfc. Also, Frank gives off really decent Pedro Pascal vibes. Rwrrr. I also read The Undercutting of Rosie and Adam, the third and final book in the series. I liked this one the least of the trilogy just due to my own predilections, but it nonetheless sticks the landing. I loved this world a lot and I’m kinda bummed there won’t be more.

Thirst by Marina Yuszczuk. At some point during my time on Goodreads, I created a shelf called “tragic hair-brushing” for a certain kind of Gothic novel, the kind that likely has a sylph-like female character who haunts her habitation wearing diaphanous dresses. The first book to go on the list was Flowers in the Attic. I’m making a little fun, but also I love this so much. Thirst is definitely a tragic hair-brushing book. The opening epigraph is a quote from The Bloody Countess: The Atrocities of Erzsebet Báthory by the surrealist poet Valentine Penrose, which details the depredations of Báthory not so much academically as emotionally. The old saw goes that a novel teaches you how to read it, and this epigraph definitely points to a rubric more psychosexual than historical. I’m a big believer that Gothic runs on vibes much more than other genres, so this is an auspicious opening. There’s a retrospective quality to Thirst that makes me hungry for the parts of the story not told, the continuations and explications. It is fitting, in a way, for a novel called Thirst that the reader is never quite sated. 

A Voice Calling by Christopher Barzak. A short story of a haunted house — and the screwed up family producing the haunting — told from the perspective of the town. The anecdotal quality was just aces.

The Secret Casebook of Simon Feximal by KJ Charles. Less a novel and more related short stories, in the vein of John Watson’s documentation of Sherlock Holmes’s cases. Here, Simon Feximal is the Holmes character, and Richard his Watson, though their romantic relationship is less subtext and more text than Sherlock & John. Simon is a ghost hunter, of sorts, and the milieu is England in the late 19th C up to the run-up to WWI. The cases often use British folklore or history, which is neat. The ghosts were often more … pyrotechnic than I prefer, but I’m not dinging the book for that, of course, just making an observation. Anyway, I really enjoyed the episodic nature of the book, because I could down what was functionally a short story at bedtime and not get sucked into staying up too late or falling asleep mid-page. 

The Night That Finds Us All by John Hornor Jacobs. Our hilariously awesome hot mess of a narrator, Sam Vines, signs on as crew to take a huge Edwardian sailing ship from the west coast of the States to England because the ship was sold. From the first, things don’t seem right. The ship is … uncanny, and Vines can’t tell if it’s the comedown from the last several months at the bottom of a bottle, or if the weird stuff is actually happening. There are three rich guys cosplaying as crew who begin to go missing, one by one, and no one knows if they went on a bender at a stopover, or something more sinister. The novel uses tons of Gothic tropes, but they’re delivered through such a likeably screwed up & deadpan narrator that I didn’t even clock them at first. Jacobs is so good; you should read all of his books right now.

Prosper’s Demon by K.J. Parker. Nasty yet entertaining little morality tale, in the medieval sense of the term, with demons and those who fight them vying for spiritual dominion. This one plays out like a trolley problem where you want the train car of people dead, which is bonkers. Nice narrative voice too.

Dead Harvest by Chris F. Holm. Urban fantasy from the heyday. The main character is a reaper, tasked with retrieving souls destined for the hot place. He’s sent to retrieve the soul of a girl who seemingly brutally murdered her entire family, but whatever spidey sense he has tells him she’s an innocent. Which kicks off a proxy war between heaven and hell focused on the reaper and the girl. This kind of story is so action-driven you sometimes feel exhausted for the characters. I really liked it and plan to finish the trilogy.

Romance/Adjacent

This is not to say that a bunch of the books I’ve stuck in other categories don’t have romantic themes, but here’s where I’m going to sweep up the novels that have a strong romantic thread — if they’re not just straight up romance novels — because they don’t fit anywhere else. As will be the theme, most of them are genre in one way or another: space opera, science fantasy, romantasy, etc.

Chaos by Constance Fay. This series, about one of those cobbled together spaceship crews of fuckups and weirdos, continues to be a whole lot of rompy fun. The author apparently works in biotech so a lot of the technobabble is next level. It’s still pretty pulpy though, which I don’t hate at all. I’m pretty much into this sort of thing to see space dudes get themselves into a pickle and then make up a bunch of nonsense to get out of it. There are also killer floofs.

The Secret by Elizabeth Hunter. This is the culmination of a story arc which began two books back about a group of people, the Irin, who are the children of angels before they left the world. I don’t think it’s amazingly plotted or anything, but the way the various themes come together for the series as a whole is pretty great. Also, Hunter does something with the concept of the mate bond that I have literally never seen anywhere else, and it’s fascinating. 

Olivia Dade. I read a lot of Olivia Dade this year, almost by accident. I stored her zombie novel, Zomromcom, in the zombie section; here’s where I’ll put the rest of it.

  • At First Spite. Jilted woman moves into the spite house next to her ex’s brother, which is awesome because spite houses are the coolest. While I get why this was written this way — there’s a parallelism between two eavesdropping conversations that bookend the plot — the crisis in the second act is an annoying overreaction which I didn’t love. But! There’s a harrowing depiction of descent into a depressive episode which rang horribly true, and I appreciate when writers show that depression can happen to anyone, even bubbly extroverts. Not all of the comedy worked for me, but there’s a lot of genuinely funny stuff in At First Spite. Also, I 100% want to be part of a monsterfucking book club.
  • Second Chance Romance. Sequel to the above. It’s got Dade’s sense of humor and body positivity — including for the dude, which is even less common — and the characters have lives and interests outside of each other, which is great. I even liked how thoughtful the romantic lead was with our heroine: giving her space, paying attention to her wants and needs, and most importantly, respecting her boundaries. But I got more and more annoyed that our thoughtful and grownup main characters absolutely refused to say anything out loud to one another, leading to one of those bullshit third act misunderstandings which I cannot abide. The annoying thing is that they had a real conflict! They lived on separate coasts, and while that’s more or less waved away, that is a genuine impediment to a relationship. Anyway, I don’t want to end on a grumpy note (and this is more grumping than bitching). This series is still a lot of fun.
  • Spoiler Alert. This and its sequel, which I also read, seem like Covid books, steeped as they are in AO3 culture and communities (specifically the BriennexJaime fandom). A fanfic writer and cosplayer of a popular show that seems an awful lot like Game of Thrones with the serial numbers filed off falls into a romance with an actor on the show. The wrinkle being said actor is ALSO her writing partner and longtime online friend, but she doesn’t know that. He doesn’t clue her in on this identity because his career would be over if the shitty showrunners found out he was writing fix-it fics, plus he’s got some serious imposter syndrome. Cute.
  • All the Feels. This is the sequel. Dade is, as usual, funny with lots of body positivity. The love interest is an actor on Game of Thrones Gods of the Gates playing Jaime Lannister Cupid. His mom has a history of spousal abuse so he’s furious that the showrunners, who are assholes, had Jaime Cupid return to his abusive relationship with Cercei Venus instead of ending up with Brienne  Psyche. The showrunners assign him a minder, our heroine, who is there to try to keep him from blowing up his career over that disastrous final season. The relationship was cute, but the real satisfaction was having someone go after Game of Thrones showrunners D&D for being such fuckwits. 

Defender by Michelle Diener. I read the absolute shit out of Diener’s space opera-y books last year. (I tried her fantasy but it didn’t click for me.) Anyway, Defender is the latest installment, published this year, in the Verdant String series, and it was a godamn treat to slip back into this world. While Diener’s books almost always have a romantic thread, they’re crazy action-driven, like the kind of story that keeps throwing absolutely terrible stuff at our heroes and then watching them be resourceful or clever or kind — especially the last — in order to get out of the mess they’re in. Super fun.

Delay of Game by Ari Baran. Read this because of all the Discourse on Heated Rivalry, and one of the people I follow recommended this series as better than Reid’s Game Changers. Of course I ended up reading #2 first. Situations that are a result of people not talking to each other kind of drive me crazy, but I thought they were mostly justified here. (Except for the last big one.) They’re both on the same team, have been friends for ages, and the consequences of their relationship going to hell are tangible. Plus, both are filled with a fair amount of anxiety, self-loathing, and impostor syndrome — some due to the pressure cooker of professional sports, some due to upbringing — which makes it hard for them to understand themselves, let alone another person. Hooray, horny hockey players! 

Pride & Prejudice by Jane Austen. Look, I know this isn’t a romance novel, but it’s definitely a formative work for latter day romance, so. Pride and Prejudice continues to be a delight, just this unbelievable mix of gently domestic and utterly savage. I was not in love with the audio reader, Rosamund Pike, who played Jane Bennett in the 2005 adaptation. I thought her straight reading was fine, but I hated her voices for Mrs Bennett and most of the men. Much sport is made of Mrs Bennett in the text, which is fair enough because Mrs Bennett is ridiculous most of the time. But honestly, Mr Bennett’s poor planning is the reason the girls are in such a precarious position in the first place, an ugly reality he deals with largely through aloof, sardonic bullshit and belittling his family. Mrs Bennett is basically the only parent taking that seriously, even if her temperament makes her bad at it. Always a rewarding book to revisit.

I Think I’m in Love With an Alien by Ann Aguirre. The set up feels a little similar to Spoiler Alert, but a more science fictional version: a group of alien aficionados who’ve been chatting for years on a subreddit or something decide to finally meet in person at an Alien Con in Roswell. Of course, some of the people are actually aliens, which is kind of an issue when they finally have an opportunity to act on their online crushes. Although this was cute and funny and the cover is an absolute banger, I didn’t enjoy this as much as Aguirre’s Galactic Love books, which are also alien romances. But it is still cute and funny!

Oddities

This is where I’m going to store all of the books that don’t fit neatly into any of the (admittedly capricious and inexact) categories I have for my reading. All of them are genre-adjacent: they all have some bit of weirdness in their settings that renders the familiar strange. This is what I said about one of the books on this list, but it really could go for all.*

I finished reading and floated around the house in a pleasant sense of ecstatic despair. I’ve felt this hard to define emotion after some of my favorite novels: The Age of Miracles by Karen Thompson Walker, The Mad Scientist’s Daughter by Cassandra Rose Clarke, or Composite Creatures by Caroline Hardaker. There’s something about stories of domestic upheaval foregrounded by intrusive technology that just utterly get to me.

*Except for the last on this list, lol. You’ll see when you get there.

I Who Have Never Known Men by Jacqueline Harpman. A group of women and one child are taken from their homes and deposited into an underground prison patrolled by silent men. They are not allowed to touch each other; the light and dark cycles appear to be random; their food is rough ingredients and they have few amenities. The girl — our narrator — grows up in this environment: untouched, almost shunned by her fellow inmates, in a prison. When they are freed, the whole situation gets a lot bleaker, which is saying something. Reminded me in a lot of ways of Wittgenstein’s Mistress: the loneliness, the sere quality of the environment, the reflection. But I Who Have Never Known Men is definitely not trying to be clever, which, for better or worse, Wittgenstein’s Mistress is. Completely fucking devastating.

On the Calculation of Volume, vol 1, by Solvej Balle. This is the first installment in a seven-volume novel by Danish writer Solvej Balle about a woman who begins to repeat November 18th, Groundhog Day-style. Three have been published in English so far, with a fourth coming out this April. It took me a while to get through this because it is so, so sad. My experience of Groundhog Day fictions is largely through comedies — though check out Two Distant Strangers if you want to see a serious treatment about racial violence in America — but I had never really understood the sadness inherent in being the only one awake in a repeating day. Gutting. Beautiful. Endless. I’ll be reading the rest.

Sunset at Zero Point by Simon Stålenhag. I completely lost my shit over everything Stålenhag a couple years back. I can’t think of a good analogy for his work, except for maybe illustrator/writer Shaun Tan: both use beautiful, arresting paintings in the service of narrative, something like a children’s picture book for adults? And even though their stories are told both with and told through illustrations, they’re not so much like comics. Anyway, I did actually write a long review of Sunset at Zero Point, but the bullet review is thus: this might be his finest work yet.

The Starving Saints by Caitlin Starling. The setting is a Medieval castle several months into a siege, at the time when there are no living animals but people and skinny rats, when hungry thoughts begin to turn to the unthinkable. But this isn’t quite Medieval Europe: there is a religion of bees, of the hive, in addition to unthinkable powers in the land itself. The prose is almost overwritten, which ends up feeling voluptuous when set against the scarcity and famine of the characters’ situation. Beautiful in a gnawing, hungry way.

Telluria by Vladimir Sorokin. Sorokin is Russian, but of a grand tradition of the ex-pat Russian writer who excoriates the current admin, which in this case is Putin. Telluria was written in 2013, but there are odd parallels with Russia’s invasion of Ukraine all over this mess of an alt-Europe. The fifty chapters of this novel are all narrated by different people, in disparate parts of a Europe which has shattered and balkanized into dozens of countries. Then also add in oddities like a drug — the titular telluria — which is administered through trepanning, or donkey and dog people, or other science fictional details which rear up in the middle of what seems like an otherwise legible recounting of events. It’s very Bulgakov, a writer who I can appreciate but don’t love. Which is to say: I don’t love Telluria, but it also gave me tons to think about.

Mean One by Ab. Cynthe. Mean One is an absolutely unhinged erotic horror retelling of The Grinch, which is exactly right. Banger of an ending, even if getting there gets a little repetitive with all the murder/fucking. Which is a sentence I didn’t expect to write.

Psy-Changeling by Nalini Singh

I’m putting this section last, in case you don’t want to read through bullet reviews of fifteen books in the same series. For whatever reason, this year I decided I was going to read through the entire Psy-Changeling series in publication order. I don’t remember when I started reading Psy-Changeling, but for sure only a half dozen or so novels and novellas were out at the time (there’s over 20 now) and, because I’m kind of a dilettante, I just read around in no particular order. Which is fine because the novels are technically standalone — it’s a romance series, so each installment focuses on a new couple, and they may or may not have any connection to the previous one — there is definitely an evolving story going on in the background. And that evolving story is so fucking cool. Once I kenned to this larger arc, I completely lost my mind and have been in the tank for this whole series. Sure, there are individual installments I don’t love, and I have the kind of criticisms one has when one loves something and wants it to be better — the biggest being the gender essentialism everywhere — but I love it both despite and because of its flaws.

Slave to Sensation. The very first Psy-Changeling novel, published in 2006. This was fun to reread because Singh hasn’t quite worked out the mechanics of everything yet, and there were a couple moments when I thought, boy, that’s not like that now. The world is thus: a hundred years before the events of the novel, in 1979, the Psy, a psychic race, decided to institute something called the Silence Protocol in the hopes of protecting themselves from out of control psychic abilities. Silence is functionally child abuse on a global scale: all Psy children are “conditioned” using pain not to express any emotion. The plot of the novel involves a Psy who must have enormous power — there are physical tells — but because that power is based in emotion, no one around her recognizes it. She ends up in a courtship with a Changeling, who are shape-shifters, in this case a big cat (maybe a jaguar? I don’t remember.) Ended up being better than I remembered.

Visions of Heat. This one, however, ended up being significantly worse. There are some things going for it: Singh introduces both the NetMind, a Gibsonian neo-sentience born out of the PsyNet which all Psy must connect to to stay alive, and Kaleb Krychek, one of the Psy world leaders and hands down my favorite character in the series. A lot of people note how similar this book and its predecessor are — high powered but unstable Psy falls in with a dominant predatory changeling, with a dated-feeling serial killer plot to act as “stakes”. But there’s a ton wrong with how our leading dickhead treats his lady love. I’ve always said that Singh typically does a great job of showing individuals working their way through trauma, and the Psy are a deeply traumatized people. Singh doesn’t use bullshit shortcuts to recovery — aka application of magic vagina — nor does she minimize the reality of that trauma. But this was the first time her traumatized Psy character read to me as neurodivergent, and the way Vaughn tramples over Faith’s clearly marked boundaries made me furious. Fuck Vaughn.

Caressed by Ice. There is some weird nonsense here which managed to sour my reread somewhat. This is saying something, because normally I’m super into a plot involving an emotionally reserved dude losing his shit over a lover. So, broad strokes: wolf-shifter Bren was abducted and brutalized by a Psy Councilor in one of the previous books. It’s been six months-ish since then, and her brothers are being overbearing about her “safety” in lieu of actually helping her heal from the trauma. (Her brothers can all go kick rocks.) She gets all fixated on Judd Lauren, one of a family of Psy who dropped out of the PsyNet and threw in with her changeling pack. Their relationship worked for me as two traumatized people learning to experience simple human pleasures, and the parts of the plot which focused on them were enjoyable. Unfortunately, there’s a lot of casually gross stuff about gender roles in this novel, plus some real bile about people who suffer from addiction being “weak.” Not great.

Mine to Possess. These early ones continue to be mid to bad. I like all the backstory we’re getting about the Psy Council, the PsyNet, the Forgotten, etc, but Talin is a dish rag and Clay a fucking dick. For example, Clay gets mad that Talin, due to the effects of sexual abuse when she was a child, was promiscuous as a young woman. Like I get why she would feel bad about that a little — it’s all wrapped up in shame and trauma — but the fact that she keeps apologizing to fucking Clay makes me furious. Fuck you, Clay. So this series continues to be bananas because I still adore the big Psy Revolution thing going on in the background, even while I want to throat punch various predatory changelings. Also, much as I hate Clay, Singh does accurately depict the effects of trauma at points, down to the ways people rely on real maladaptive behavior, and recovery is a difficult and often incomplete process. Clay sucks, but he also takes Talin’s fear of the dark and enclosed spaces seriously and doesn’t expect her to magically get over a phobia just by thinking about it, so.

Hostage to Pleasure. This one starts to cook! The main guy is annoying because he’s a predatory changeling and all the “feral protectiveness” that implies (I swear Singh uses that phrase dozens of times). The book itself is pretty mythology-heavy; just ignore Dorian’s bullshit. (Also, there’s a scene here where he prematurely blows his load because she, like, pokes his penis, which made me laugh so hard I had to put the book down for a minute.) The Psy half of the couple has a deeply disturbing relationship with her twin sister, and coming out of that looks a lot like decoupling from an abuser. Singh also builds out how the PsyNet works and gets into Psy Council politics, which is why I’m here.

Branded by Fire. Singh doesn’t go in for enemies-to-lovers all that often, so Branded by Fire is notable in that regard. So a little backstory: through the course of the series, the changeling packs DarkRiver and SnowDancer — leopard and wolf packs, respectively — more or less fuse into one big super-pack. Though they’ve been moving closer together due to the various Psy-expats in their ranks, the romance between Mercy and Riley, who are sort of military enforcers for their own packs, cements this alliance. Basically, they bang it out after a big wedding that both packs are involved with, and then angst for the next 300 pages about dogs and cats living together, mass hysteria! Branded by Fire lurches between being a bunch of gender essentialist nonsense and fine character work, which is how these middle books roll.

Blaze of Memory. Blaze of Memory is a perfectly cromulent outing, even if I felt a little squirmy at points, and really pushes the mythology along in satisfying ways. Devraj Santos, the leader of the Forgotten — Psy who left the PsyNet rather than submit to the brutal emotional conditioning called Silence — is pretty much a classic incel. His love interest is Katya, a woman specifically and obviously sent in to be the kind of spy a misogynist expects. Their interactions are … not always great. But Singh knows how to show recovery from trauma well, and I love the way it’s both based on community action, and sometimes incomplete. When people heal from trauma, they don’t get better on their own or due to a lover’s devotion, but because communities of people care for both their bodies and minds. Blaze of Memory definitely leans romantic suspense, which I have limited success with but, again, all the stuff with Net was so compelling I don’t even care. Something is very wrong on the PsyNet, and it’s getting worse.

Bonds of Justice. While I like this installment — Max Shannon is a lot more affectionate and thoughtful than most of Singh’s heroes — I really noticed how weird Singh’s attitude to criminal justice is. The plot involves a J-Psy, psychics who have useful powers for the criminal justice system. Having to go into the minds of murderous psychopaths isn’t good for their health though, so Js end up used up by their mid-30s. Max works for Enforcement which is like the … FBI maybe? (Honestly, nothing about the governments and bureaucracies in the Psy-Changeling world make any sense.) J-Psys often push already incarcerated murderers to kill themselves as a form of “justice”, which all the main characters endorse. Extrajudicial murder by the ostensible good guys shows up often in Psy-Changeling books, and it’s often directed at addicts. Needless to say, I’m super uncomfortable with this, especially i/r/t addicts. I feel like this endorsement of vigilantes tones down a bit in later books and there is some acknowledgement that addiction is a disease that should not be treated with a death sentence, but it’s still there.

Play of Passion. I had mixed this one up in my memory with another Psy-Changeling novel with a similar conflict: the woman is more “dominant” than her boyfriend, which is obviously a huge problem for fragile male egos and other gender essentialist nonsense. The other novel “solves” this by having her actually be a maternal, a category of shifter that exists in the universe but is there largely to be a punchline: haha, the alphas are so scared to go see the mommies. She’s not really dominant, she’s just such a mama bear, etc. Which means I was braced for that appalling conclusion most of the way through Play of Passion, which is too bad. The main couple here are good friends and colleagues, and the way they navigate their conflicting roles and responsibilities is actually pretty great.

Kiss of Snow. I remembered this one fondly because I <3 when Singh addresses the whole concept of a mate bond and fated mates and all that jazz head on. Because while I understand why the concept is appealing — it makes a relationship as difficult and fragile as one based on romantic love unbreakable and enduring — the whole idea of being eternally bonded to someone who will inevitably change, and not always for the better, gives me the screaming fantods. Like what if they join an MLM? What if they get super into crypto? (same/same) My massive and enduring issues aside, Kiss of Snow is about the Alpha of the San Francisco wolf pack, Hawke — which, I might add, is the silliest name for a lupine changeling — and the oldest Lauren kid, Sienna, who is part of a family of Psy taken in by the pack. Hawke lost the girl who was his fated mate when she died at five years old. So Sienna and Hawke dance around each other for the book, with Hawke being high-handed and emotionally withholding, while simultaneously not respecting boundaries that Sierra keeps trying to impose. I did ultimately respect what Singh was doing here, even if I didn’t see why she was doing it that way at first, so the middle act was harder sledding for me. Good outing tho.

Tangle of Need. This is the one with the dominant maternal that I was worried about. It ended up being better than I remembered, even if the whole dominant maternal thing makes my ass twitch. Lots of mythology, which I love, but the main couple still did significantly more meaningless wheel-spinning than I prefer. I did like that Singh addresses couples who can’t or won’t have a mate bond. She’s done this before with Sienna and Hawke, but he had an easy out in that his potential mate was deceased. Here the guy’s potential mate was alive and well and happily married, and he still chose the person he loved over the one that some bullshit magical mate bond chose for him. Love is ultimately a choice, and I like that Singh underlines that here.

Heart of Obsidian. The next three Psy-Changeling novels are very good — and it’s notable that they’re a dozen novels deep into a series — but Heart of Obsidian is my favorite by a country mile. Kaleb Krychek has been around since the second book as a unthinkably powerful Psy — he could literally crack the planet in half — with utterly opaque motivations. He was raised by another Psy Councilor who was a serial killing psycho, and no one knows if he shares his mentor’s predilections. He’s been searching for a girl who gave him kindness and affection when he was a vulnerable and abused adolescent, and he finally finds her in this novel. As a romance, this is fascinating stuff: Kaleb is deeply flawed (I think shrinks would call it an attachment disorder) and while he finds love, he remains deeply flawed. I think it’s notable that love doesn’t erase his character flaws, nor does it undo the effects of a childhood of abuse. Singh lets Kaleb heal one part of himself and stay otherwise messy, which is so very cool.

Shield of Winter. Singh doesn’t always do the best job having her romance plot and the overt plot work together. She relies on dated-feeling serial-killer machinations (so 90s!) or random violence by poorly-reasoned guerilla groups as plot-drivers a lot, and irrespective of what her lovers are going through. Shield of Winter, however, is perfectly balanced. Vasic is an Arrow, one of a Psy paramilitary group devoted to maintaining Silence. Now that Silence has fallen, they have to adjust to the new realities. Ivy Jane is an E-Psy (that’s the emotion one, like Sascha Duncan in the first book) one of a dozen the Arrows bring together to try to figure out why the PsyNet is dying. Vasic is also dying, due to a malfunctioning bio-mechanical gauntlet he had installed in an almost suicidal gesture. Here Singh starts addressing head on how horrific the eugenics practiced under Silence was, which I am 100% here for. I am also a sucker for the way Singh focuses on the small pleasures her Psy characters experience as they come out of Silence: the softness of clothing, the warmth and sweetness of hot chocolate, the joys of caring for a pet.

Shards of Hope. This one leans romantic-suspense, which I normally have limited success with (so much copaganda!) but it works here really well. Aden and Zaira are both Arrows, part of that paramilitary group I mentioned in Shield of Winter. Arrows are largely taken in as children because they have powerful, often lethal psychic powers which result in them killing or endangering their families of origin. (I have a whole thing about how utterly bonkers the conception of government is in the Psy-Changeling books, which I will not get into here, but know that I have at least an hour long cassette tape on the subject.) In Shards of Hope, Aden & Zaira wake up in some remote facility after unknown persons have abducted them and stuck chips in their brains for god knows what purpose. They escape out into a snow storm, and then have to do things like brain surgery under a tree in the middle of nowhere. It’s nail-biting stuff.

Allegiance of Honor. Allegiance of Honor is the fifteenth and final book in what Singh calls the “first season” of the Psy-Changeling novels. Silence has fallen, and a tentative way forward has been forged in the Trinity Accord. Unfortunately, the book sucks beyond the telling of it, and that after three of the best books in the series. I’ve taken a run at it a couple times, but always get stopped when I realize it’s the romance equivalent of a clip show: basically we check in with literally all of the couples from the previous fourteen books and get to watch them canoodling and congratulating themselves on how perfect their lives are. Gag. There is a romance but it has zero stakes, which is fine because it’s maybe 5% of the page count. I pushed through this time in the interests of completism. While I’m kind of glad I did — there were a number of instances where Singh introduces characters who become the subject of later books, and I liked seeing the origin stories — I will never read it again.

Final Thoughts

So! That’s my reading for the year. The list isn’t complete: there were some rereads I didn’t bother to note, some books I read at the beginning of the year and don’t remember enough to say, and a couple books I hated, but I’m trying to practice restraint throwing stones on the internet. Also, I’ve gotten pretty good at tossing books I’m not grooving on before I make the mistake of reading to the end. Life is short, &c.

It was notable to me how much 2010s urban fantasy I read — everything from zombie novels to more paranormal romance. I should probably read more weird genre litfic, because, judging from the Oddities section, that stuff turns my crank. It’s also hard reading, in way, not to be undertaken when tired or on the commute, so I get why I don’t read more of it. I read for many reasons: because I can’t sleep, the joy of language, to pass the time, to learn something, to feel something. These reasons aren’t mutually exclusive, necessarily, but they also don’t always conjoin.

Happy reading! We’ll see what I get up to this year.

The Year in Reading: 2023

As we approach the new year, I feel like it’s customary to look back and castigate ourselves on not learning French or how to knit or whatever, and promise to do better next year. I probably will never learn French or how to knit, but I will likely continue to read a lot. There isn’t any particular theme to my reading, but there can be clusters of interest. As always, there’s a disproportionate number of books which are zombie or zombie-adjacent narratives. I also seemed to gravitate to lighter Star Trek/Wars-y space opera this year. And if last year was the Year of Seanan McGuire, this year was The Year of Martha Wells, which kind of crept up on me. She was guest at Minicon, so I started reading her stuff to get more out of her panels, and then just never stopped. I also feel like I did more audio this year, although maybe it just feels like it because of the commute.

So here’s an incomplete summary of what I’ve read this year.

Zombruary: February was given over to reading zombie books, like usual, but then of course I read a bunch more as the year went on. 

  • Devils Wake by Tananarive Due and Stephen Barnes. A bunch of juvenile delinquents try to ride out the zombie apocalypse in a summer camp outside of Seattle. Excellent dialogue and a well-rounded cast elevate a familiar early outbreak narrative, plus mushrooms are going to kill us all. I never read the sequel, but maybe this Zombruary. 
  • Hollow Kingdom by Kira Jane Buxton. Also set in the PNW, this zombie outbreak is narrated by a pet crow, which sounded delightfully strange. It has potential, but bogs down horribly in the middle with a lot of flashy, overwritten prose which doesn’t do anything, and I’m still mad about the death of that one character. 
  • Last Ones Left Alive by Sarah Davis-Goff. I’d read this before and enjoyed it, but then also really didn’t understand what happened at the end. I’ve always said zombie stories are especially attuned to location – at least as much as mysteries, if not moreso – and Last Ones Left Alive is very, very Irish. Orpen is raised off of the West coast of Ireland on an island free of the skrake; she has to go to the mainland once her mother is killed and her other mom bitten. I still don’t know what happened at the end, but at least the sequel came out this year so that might answer that. 
  • Handling the Undead by John Ajvide Lindquist. Lindquist burst onto the scene with his take on vampires in Let Me In; here he tackles the reanimated dead. There’s a lot of nice stuff in here about how the return of loved ones would disrupt the grieving process and complicate the relief of death, and several sequences that gave me the screaming fantods – the bath, that eel – but the novel unfortunately falls apart in the end. 
  • Eat Brains Love by Jeff Hart. Rompy YA novel with two pov characters: a just-turned zombie – the kind that look totally normal if they keep eating people – and a teenaged psychic who is part of a government team that puts down zombie outbreaks. The sort of Sleepless in Seattle-style romantic subplot did not work, but otherwise the plot zips along with enough action and humor to keep you from nitpicking. 
  • Zombruary was over when I listened to Zone One by Colson Whitehead again. Boy, but I love that novel, which is weird, because it’s aggressively literary and absolutely unconcerned with genre, if you take my meaning. A depressed guy moves to New York, like he always dreamed of doing, and it doesn’t help the depression one bit. With zombies. 
  • Everything Dies by TW Malpass. Complete opposite of Zone One: totally pulpy and genre-bound to a fault. It’s fine, but I am absolutely sick to death of cartoon bad guys threatening sexual assault to prove the situation is serious. 
  • The Rise of the Governor by Robert Kirkman and Jay Bonansinga. Remember that thing I just said about sexual assault? Well, strap the fuck in. Maybe, maybe this could have worked if it was a portrait of Phillip Blake — aka The Governor, early antagonist to Rick Grimes and the Rickocrats — largely through the lens of his younger, bullied brother, Brian. But then, plot twist! Brian takes Phillip’s name at the end, after his brother finally, deservedly gets his head blown off. This means I’ve read through several hundred pages of some asshole raping and murdering his way through the zombie apocalypse, only to have an eleventh hour protagonist switch which gives me zero insight as to how Brian turns into the Governor. I mean, I think I’m supposed to postulate some sort of dissociative PTSD-induced DID, but that’s fucking stupid and not how any of this works. Ugh.
  • The Investigation by Stanislaw Lem. Corpses of the newly dead start getting up and walking out into the snow; after an interval of less than a day, they fall down dead again. Set in 1950s England, The Investigation is something like a satire of the police procedural crossed with a Gothic novel, and as those are almost completely antithetical genres, it’s occasionally brilliant but often confusing. (The time displacement is a thing too; it’s been 65 years since this novel was written, and I found a lot of the social mores perplexing.) It’s still Lem though, so funny in a desert dry way and brisk enough to tug me along to the end, even if I didn’t always get what was going on. 
  • Empire of the Dead by George A Romero. No one told me Romero wrote comics! Y’all are on notice. Set loosely in the “…of the Dead” universe, Empire of the Dead asks, but what if vampires too? This leads inevitably to existential questions re: the various kinds of undeath, some of which are dealt with hilariously. It is set in a very stupid classic dystopia tho, which I did not enjoy. 

Various Series..es I Continued or Reread: I feel like I have an escalating number of series that I either haven’t finished or the author is still putting out installments, which isn’t helped at all by the fact that I have a tendency to wander away about two books into any given trilogy. 

  • Wolfhound Empire by Peter Higgins. I read the first installment, Wolfhound Century, a dozen years ago when it came out, but then never followed up. I listened to that and the sequel, Truth & Fear, to and from work, and then discovered, to my eternal irritation, that the final installment was never read out as audio. Really cool steampunky alt-historical take on the Soviet Union, with a side of eldritch horror. I guess I’ll have to read the third.
  • I also listened to the entire Southern Reach trilogy by Jeff VanderMeer — Annihilation, Authority and Acceptance — which is an excellent audio. (Bronson Pynchot is a stupid good narrator; who knew?) I find that entire series incredibly disquieting, especially the second, and as I said before, mushrooms are going to kill us all. 
  • Rivers of London by Ben Aaronovich. Urban fantasy set in London with a local historian’s eye towards London history. Really fun, with a cosmopolitan mix sometimes absent from urban fantasy, perversely. My one complaint is the inherent copaganda of a series with a Met copper as the lead, and in reality, the Met police are fucking awful. Managed to get to book two, Moon Over Soho, before I wandered off, but I’m sure I’ll get back to it. 
  • Galactic Bonds by Jennifer Estep. The first and second of this series, Only Bad Options and Only Good Enemies bracketed the year. Not great! Romance-y space opera set in one of those feudal nightmares one can find in a certain kind of scifi. But I have a thing about mate-bonds and how terrible they are, and this series deals head on with how terrible they are, so. Shrug emoticon. 
  • Class 5 series by Michelle Diener: Dark Horse, Dark Deeds, Dark Minds, &c. Compulsively read all five of the books in this series in like a minute. They all involve humans abducted and thrown into real Star Trek-y galactic politics. They remind me of Bujold’s Cordelia books, the way they have great escalating stakes for our principles to clever their way out of. Bujold’s probably crunchier, whatever that means. 
  • Our Lady of Endless Worlds by Lina Rather. I liked the first of this series, Sisters of the Vast Black, better than the second, Sisters of the Forsaken Stars. The overt plot felt a little careworn: I have seen a lot of arrogant, dying empires commit atrocities in pursuit of recapturing their dominion, and might even be said to live in one. But I am a sucker for nifty space stuff, and a group of nuns living on a living spaceship and debating whether to let their living ship go off and mate like it wants to is major nifty space stuff. 
  • Janitors of the Post-Apocalypse by Jim C. Hines. I read the first two a million years ago when I was writing for B&N, and then kinda forgot about the series. Finally finished the series with Terminal Peace. Hines lost his wife to cancer between writing book two and three, and the tonal shift is apparent: For a comedy, this has a strong current of grief. I didn’t mind, as this series has always had more serious themes underneath all the exploding space toilets. I also have big hearts for eyes for working class heroes, and our post-apocalyptic janitors get really inventive with cleaning products. 
  • Earthsea by Ursula K LeGuin. Reread both A Wizard of Earthsea and The Tombs of Atuan. Much as I adore A Wizard of Earthsea, the way it dispatches with the monomyth in a tight 200 pages, I was struck by how quietly, perfectly subversive Atuan is. Gah, I just love it all so much. 
  • Longshadow by Olivia Atwater. The third (and maybe final?) book in the Regency Fairy Tales series, I didn’t love this one as much as the first two, Half a Soul and Ten Thousand Stitches. Gaslamp fantasy in an alt-Regency setting, not dissimilar from Zen Cho’s Sorcerer to the Crown, but interrogating class & disability more than race. 
  • Witness for the Dead by Katherine Addison. Sort of an adjacent series to The Goblin Emperor, Cemeteries of Amalo is something like a police procedural without the police, but with lots of fun bureaucracy and the occasional ghoul attack. The main character is profoundly grieving, which you don’t figure out for a while, and colors all of his interactions with both the living and the dead. Really fine. 
  • Resonance Surge by Nalini Singh. Yup, still on my Psy-Changeling bullshit. I reread the previous two, Last Guard and Storm Echo, to try to figure out what was up with the whole Scarab situation, but then I realized I didn’t care. Last Guard is the best of the Psy-Changeling Trinity books to date, imao.
  • Murderbot Chronicles by Martha Wells. I’d read them all before, but me and the fam listened to the first six novel/las in this series during long car rides over the year, culminating in the most recent, System Collapse. I just love Murderbot’s bellyaching about how it just wants to get back to its stories. Hard same, Murderbot. 
  • The Fall of Ile-Rien by Martha Wells. Another series undertaken on the commute to and from work, for the most part. Completely odd series, because while I never felt like I was having my socks blown off or anything during books one & two, The Wizard Hunters and The Ships of Air, but by the time I got to book three, The Gate of The Gods, I was completely invested, and spent more time than I should admit to sitting in the garage after the drive home absolutely freaking out by some upset in the book. Kind of steampunk and sort of gaslamp fantasy, the Edwardian English-ish country of Ile-Rien has been losing badly to a mysterious people they call the Gardier. Honestly, the whole thing is so complicated I couldn’t possibly sum it succinctly. As a clash of empires story, it’s notably grounded in personal perspectives, and never loses sight of how trauma and grief work on both societal and individual levels. 

Graphic: I didn’t read a lot of comics/graphic stuff this year. I started maybe a half dozen things, but nothing I wanted to read past the first installment. I feel like I used to have better recommendations on what series to check out, though idk what that was or where it went. Oh well. 

  • All the Simon Stålenhag. I completely lost my shit over Stålenhag’s loose trilogy, Tales from the Loop, Things from the Flood, and The Electric State. The first two are a sort of oral history from the children who grew up around the Loop, a CERN-like installation in rural Sweden, in the 80s and 90s. The third goes to America and gets a fuck of a lot darker. I just cannot get over the weird mix of credulity and incredulity that one finds in the adult recount of childhood. Plus there’s this line from the movie Nope that I keep coming back to: what do you call a bad miracle? Because each installment, and increasingly, are characterized by bad nostalgia, which like a bad miracle seems a contradiction in terms. Nostalgia is memory without shame. Completely gutting. (The Labyrinth will also fuck you up.) 
  • No 6 by Atsuka Asano. I’ve been very slowly working my way through this yaoi manga set in a classic dystopia. It’s not amazing, but I’m ride or die for Dogkeeper. 

Gothic/Horror/Supernatural: The pandemic kind of messed me up there for a couple years, and I was unable to find much joy in the macabre. But I’m back, baby! Not all of the following books are strictly horror, but they’re all weird in their own way. 

  • American Elsewhere by Robert Jackson Bennett. I’m very susceptible to horror which takes place in the Uncanny Valley — and if that town nestled in that vale is set dressed in mid-century modern trappings, more’s the better. Mona inherits a house in a town called Wink from her long dead mother. Wink is something like Los Alamos, a town created for the scientists in the facility on the mesa. What those scientists were doing was altogether as awful as the Manhattan Project, but more localized. Underneath all the squirming tentacles and mirrors which don’t reflect the rooms they are in is an intensely sad story of indifferent mothers and damaged daughters. Not my usual reaction to cosmic horror, but here we are. 
  • Amatka by Karin Tidbeck. Another book I flipped my shit over, just 100% in my wheelhouse. Something like Soviet Noir, but the mystery is the nature of reality, not a murder. I adore a science fictional bureaucracy, and the world here appears to be literally, physically made out of bureaucracy. Solaris by way of The Southern Reach, with a little bit of Wolfhound Century thrown in
  • The Salt Grows Heavy by Cassandra Khaw. I wasn’t in the right mood for this, but forced it, which is a shame all around. I can be on the hook for bloody, beautiful prose that is this side of overwritten (and certainly, for some, would be over the line), and what she does with The Little Mermaid is both upside down and inside out. I might reread when I know I’m in the mood. 
  • The Little Homo Sapiens Scientist by S.L. Huang. Another retelling of The Little Mermaid with a central inversion. The Little Homo Sapiens Scientist is a gut punch of a story, and gave me the kind of world that I would absolutely kill to see in a larger fiction. Highly recommended. 
  • Such Sharp Teeth by Rachel Harrison. I kind of can’t believe I’ve never seen a werewolf novel which uses lycanthropy as a metaphor for the body horror of pregnancy before. The voice is pitch perfect aging hipster millennial (and I mean that in a good way): both self assured and self loathing in equal measures, quipping, funny, allusive. And the werewolf parts are gross. That said, I don’t think the ending was altogether successful. It’s not bad, just kinda tonally off, and the revealed antagonist is disappointing. Still, it was an enjoyable read, and sometimes the getting there is worth the end. 
  • Tender is the Flesh by Agustina Bazterrica. I’ve been desensitized to a certain amount of gore because of my love of zombie fiction, and even then the body horror in Tender is the Flesh was a lot. After an animal-borne pathogen leads to the eradication of everything from livestock to zoo animals to pets, cannibalism is systemized and normalized. Bazterrica is very deliberate in the linguistic distinctions between “special meat” and legally recognized people, and all of the ways those distinctions bend, break, and fail with even everyday stressors. The ending is abrupt, deliberately so, and features violations so intense I literally shuddered. Disgust is a function of both empathy and contempt. Jfc.
  • Carmilla by J. Sheridan Le Fanu. I feel like I need to make a tag called “tragic, romantic hair-brushing” for my reading. Just off the top of my head, I would tag this, the Dollenganger books, and The Bloody Chamber by Angela Carter. 
  • The Fall of the House of Usher by Edgar Allan Poe. Somehow missed this one when I read all my Poe at 16 or so. Completely bugshit; loved it.  
  • A Night in Lonesome October by Roger Zelazney. There are 31 chapters in Lonesome October to correspond with the 31 days in the month, so I did the thing where I read a chapter a day (mostly). The novel is narrated by a dog and features a cast of Gothic types – vampires, magicians, Sherlock Holmes, &c – and their animal familiars, so it’s definitely on the goofier end of Gothic fiction. Delightful and strange. 
  • The Scapegracers by HA Clarke. I want to write some quip about how The Scapegracers is like The Craft for Zoomers, but this is exactly the same kind of facile analogy as when people call Lev Grossman’s The Magicians “a grown-up Hogwarts.” It’s not just The Craft for Zoomers; it’s a witchy, queer, neurodivergent coming of age that you didn’t know you needed, but you do.

Various One-Offs: Not everything fits into a neat category! So here’s some stuff that didn’t fit anywhere else.

  • Station Eleven by Emily St John Mandel. Speaking of The Magicians, I decided to read this novel because I became completely obsessed with the show adapted from it. I liked the show better, but the book has a lot going for it. Station Eleven is often (but not completely) a post-apocalyptic pastoral, of the type that Ursula K Le Guin or John Crowley or even Kim Stanley Robinson wrote in the 70s and 80s, but haven’t had much traction in our more saturnine times. 
  • Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead by Tom Stoppard. Continuing the Shakespeare month I was having, I listened to an audio version of Stoppard’s first play on the way back from seeing the most recent Guthrie production of Hamlet. It’s definitely the work of a young, clever man: brilliant in places, but also completely beset by its own im/mortality in ways the works of older people never are. Weird, that. 
  • Final Night by Kell Shaw. Could also file this under “zombies,” but that’s not really accurate. Kind of an oddball mix of an alternate present based on some high fantasy fol-de-rol, and an urban fantasy set-up wherein a person has to solve her own murder, 20 years before. Not entirely successful, but then also energetic and interesting enough to keep me reading. I appreciate when people do weird shit with sometimes tired tropes. 
  • Catfishing on CatNet by Naomi Kritzer. I really, really loved the way Kritzer captured how friendships formed on the internet work, without treating them like lesser order relationships. I doubly appreciated how she captured the familiar/strangeness of meeting someone you’ve only known through a text medium. I haven’t read a lot of YA recently because it makes me feel old, but this was pitch perfect. 
  • Redshirts by John Scalzi. Honestly, this is the laziest sf book I’ve read since late period Asimov, with exactly the same ratio of casual mastery to dumbass what-the-fuckery. Fans of Scalzi’s writing will find this the kind of thing they like; the rest of us end up with a stress-response to dialogue tags, because literally every single utterance has one, something which becomes unavoidably obvious when you, say, listen to the audio. 
  • A Dead Djinn in Cairo by P. Djèlí Clark. Neat little short story set in an alt-history Egypt, one in which the world-building is a central character. I keep meaning to read the other fictions set in this world.
  • The Fellowship of the Ring by JRR Tolkien. It’s been a minute since I’ve read this, long enough that some of the movie-stuff got set as book-stuff, so it was nice to course correct. It’s such a flex to spend just ages talking shit about hobbits before ever getting into the story at all, and then when you do, it’s another age of Frodo mooning about the Shire doing a lot of tragic, romantic hair-brushing (another for the tag??) Andy Serkis does a damn fine job as narrator.

Currently Reading: I’m still working on a couple things.

  • The Reformatory by Tananarive Due. Historical horror set in a reformatory in Jim Crow Florida. Due has a really beautiful prose style, which is good, because the relentless cruelty the main characters are subjected to is painful. The novel is dedicated to an uncle who didn’t make it out alive.
  • Ghosted by Amanda Quinn. A gender-switched contemporary take on Austen’s Northanger Abbey which so far is pretty cute. The main character is Hattie Tilney, whose mom is the emotionally distant headmaster of a boarding school. It’s a little over-determined — the theme is ghosts, and a lot — but I’m really digging Hattie’s barely-maintaining overachiever and her shitty, transactional friends. I’m really curious how she’s going to manage the last bit in OG Northanger, where Gen Tilney turns Catherine Morland out like an asshole.
  • Exit Ghost by Jennifer R Donohue. Another gender-flipped take on the classics, this time Hamlet. Not as far into this one, so I have less to say, but I really loved what she did with the ghost-on-the-battlements scene.

So! That, as they say, is that.

(Here’s my roundups from 2022 and 2020; 2021 was difficult.)

Writing Sex into the Classics

This was originally written a couple years ago after reading two erotic updates of English literature classics, which seemed an inevitable outgrowth of the monster mash-ups that became something of a fad after the surprise success of Pride and Prejudice and Zombies. I was reminded of its existence when I ran across a Northanger Abbey with sex writing mash-up recently. I haven’t gone back to see if my little theory about Austen and sex writing works at all, but I do applaud the mash-up writer for taking on one of my favorite Austen heroes. He was just the kind of gentle and mansplainy that I would expect.

A quick disclaimer: this isn’t really a “review”. That’s generally true when I’m writing “reviews”, but I felt squeamish reading through it for spelling errors and the like. This is a complete and total overreaction and overthink of some very silly stuff, and I just want to be clear that I’m aware of that. If you really give a shit about whether you’ll like a smut version of “Daisy Miller” by Henry James, or the continuing erotic adventures of Dorian Gray by Oscar Wilde, I will repeat this quote attributed to so many people as to be a mysterious aphorism: people who like this sort of thing will find this the sort of thing they like. I mean, seriously. 

I get why contemporary writers do pulp retellings of 19th Century literature. So much of what gives the original stories juice is the unspoken or the alluded, all that subterranean emotion thrumming through the stories like blood. The thing I remember most from Wuthering Heights, for example, is Cathy running out into the moors, tearing all her clothes off, and becoming a werewolf. And before you get on me, yes, of course I know this didn’t happen. But the image is what my mind makes of all the subtext, all this howling and brutality and half-creatures. While Wuthering Heights is an absolute hatecast, there’s a lot of ambiguity there, a closed mouth about certain things which isn’t so much coy as withholding. I can see the instinct to nail it down, to make it be one thing and not all the others. So of course it’s dumb and painful that Stephenie Meyer, in Eclipse, remakes this story of blood and revenge into a doddering middle class non-problem, but she absolutely gets the werewolf right. She makes it one thing and not the others.

Conversely, let us consider Austen, who probably has the largest body of retellings of her works. (Interestingly, these mash-ups tend to be either horror or romance; maybe it’s the embodied angle of both genres? Or, wait, there are some mysteries, which I tend not to read, so this theory is more about my predilections than anything. Carry on.) Unlike the Brontës, Austen is very rarely, and only under the most dire of circumstances, a Romantic — heed my capital letter, friends — even while her stories are intensely domestic. It has been observed that no two men speak to one another without a woman present in all of her novels, as she has the concision of the documentarian. She has never seen two men speak without a woman (herself) present, and she’s hard-headed enough to stick to the things she’s seen, rather than the things she can imagine.

She’s got a mercantile bent, so much so that one almost despairs ever meeting the principles of Sense and Sensibility when one picks it up, given the reems of description of everyone’s financial state. Observe:

By a former marriage, Mr. Henry Dashwood had one son; by his present lady, three daughters. The son, a steady, respectable young man, was amply provided for by the fortune of his mother, which had been large, and half of which devolved on him on his coming of age. By his own marriage, likewise, which happened soon afterwards, he added to his wealth. To him therefore the succession to the Norland estate was not so really important as to his sisters; for their fortune, independent of what might arise to them from their father’s inheriting that property, could be but small. Their mother had nothing, and their father only seven thousand pounds in his own disposal; for the remaining moiety of his first wife’s fortune was also secured to her child, and he had only a life interest in it.”

Jane Austen, Sense and Sensibility

Zzzzzzz. 

Look, I love Austen like the catty, introverted cousin I hang on the wall with while at family functions, drinking — which is to say: a lot — but this is some bloodless stuff. Much as the mistaken asshole plot from Pride and Prejudice has become a mainstay of romance novels, Austen herself would not particularly care for the high emotions of such a thing, especially if the principles failed to take into account or straight up flaunted social/economic/racial divides. Which happens often in romance novels because the driving considerations of a match are emotional; love trumps all incompatibilities. Education heals all, to Austen, or possibly one’s good nature, or manners, or all three, but then only provisionally, and only for the narrowest of slices of society. Maybe. Money is most definitely very large factor. 

So I can see why people want to sex her up. Austen doesn’t give us much to go on, in terms of physicality: Elizabeth has “fine eyes” and Darcy, honestly I don’t know if he is short or tall or blond or what. Elizabeth even pokes at the Romantic sensibility right before she gets her own moral/economic slapdown at Pemberley, so awed by her would-be lover’s stuff and things she doesn’t “know herself”:

“My dear, dear aunt,” she rapturously cried, “what delight! what felicity! You give me fresh life and vigour. Adieu to disappointment and spleen. What are men to rocks and mountains? Oh! what hours of transport we shall spend! And when we do return, it shall not be like other travellers, without being able to give one accurate idea of any thing. We will know where we have gone — we will recollect what we have seen. Lakes, mountains, and rivers shall not be jumbled together in our imaginations; nor, when we attempt to describe any particular scene, will we begin quarrelling about its relative situation. Let our first effusions be less insupportable than those of the generality of travellers.” [all sic, because Austen can’t spell, bless her heart]

Jane Austen, Pride and Prejudice

What are men, indeed, Elizabeth? The romance novel heroine might protest in much the same way: no, of course I do not love Slade, who is either wealthy or secretly wealthy. But her revelation that she loves him would never come at observing Slade’s tangible wealth; that would be too bald, strangely. Indeed the opposite is more often true: the romantic heroine’s lack of care for his wealth is the test that paradoxically provides her worthiness. She is no golddigger. She does not consider such hard, true, palpable things as money in her calculations of her happiness, except insofar as her poverty is a virtue. There are roughly one million romance novels that pair the noble poor woman with a dickish billionaire, running a redemption arc for the wealthy while both volorizing poverty and slyly denigrating the poor. The worthy poor get a hand out; the rest of you lot are probably getting what you deserve.

In some ways, adding sex to Austen balances the scale. All scandals, my dad once told me, have to do with either sex or money. Austen’s scandals tend to be about money. Though sex occasionally factors, money is always the prime mover, that thing that bends passions and taints the tentative beginnings. Austen is no Victorian: This isn’t because she’s squeamish or a prude. The bone fide sex scandals in her novels do not result in redemptive death for the woman; neither Lydia Bennet nor the Bertram sister from Mansfield Park get consumption and die as punishment. The consequences of their actions flow naturally, and are not there as moral instruction (which is actually astonishing, considering.) But latter day stories featuring Elizabeth and Darcy often find them, post nuptials, engaging in all the hard passions denied the satirist, because Austen’s aim is not moralizing but satirizing.

The latter day erotic retelling aligns Austen to more post-War middle class American sensibilities: you can talk about money, but only as a metric for plucky self-determination, or for virtue-signaling purposes. Virtue is rewarded, often materially, in the narrative, which is something that often doesn’t happen in Austen. Elinor Dashwood and her beau are quite impoverished, in the end, as are Fanny and Edmund. And sex in a certain species of boilerplate romance novel — the kind you find on the spinning rack — is weirdly morally pure. I once spend a wedding shower in the company of born again Christian in-laws, who regaled me with their sexual exploits in terms far too explicit for this humble humanist. Sex in the confines is exalted, apparently. It makes sense, theologically: emotions are more important that fact, faith more important than works, at least in ground game American evangelical Christianity, which I think has tangible impact on the morality of your average romance novel. Fuck all you want; you’re married.

This sainted carnality is well more important in the contemporary erotic retelling than Austen’s uneasy broodings about education and morality, the subtle differences between good breeding and good manners, with all the attendant, antique and oft unpleasant implications of such concepts. I like Austen because I do not agree with her in many things (insofar as anyone can “agree” with a society 200 years distant) but I adore how serious, subtle, and nuanced her considerations are. Austen’s creatures do something more interesting than fucking, but I get how people want to see the fucking as an outgrowth of the more interesting, how they want to see it flat and straight. How fucking simplifies all the problems brought up by Austen, makes them cleanly dirty.

Which brings me rather long-windedly to these two fictions: Daisy Miller: The Wild and Wanton Edition by Gabrielle Vigot and Henry Miller (snort), and The Wilde Passions of Dorian Gray by Mitzi Szerto. Both of the original works are fictions with thick erotic subtexts, something near satire, almost didactic, definitely a hard examination of the author’s social milieu. It might be unfair to compare these two latter day appendage fictions: wild & wanton Daisy Miller is a mash-up, stitching sex writing into James’s short story, while Wilde Passions is a continuation, imagining the later day travails of the immortal Dorian Gray. I think it works in the way that Pride & Prejudice & Zombies sits uneasily yet surely with its inferior prequel: Pride & Prejudice & Zombies: Dawn of the Dreadfuls. These are all fictions tied to the trajectories of larger gravities, unable to be considered as separate works by even the most New Critical of folk. 

So. Wild & wanton Daisy Miller is probably easier to consider, what with its brevity and large chunks of the original text. I can see why it’s attractive just to stitch fuck sequences into 19th century lit — like porn, you don’t have to mess around with actual plot, etc — but such an enterprise becomes stylistically dodgy when dealing with an author as distinctive as Henry James. I have never read the original Daisy Miller, and I could tell, down to the sentence, where the graft occurred. But the early sex sequences were honestly adorable, with Daisy and Winterbourne enacting fantasy and reverie at the edges of James’s work. This dreamy, half-imagined fuckery seemed right in line with James’s aesthetic, with a brooding, half-real cast to it. It was only as the story unspooled that things got dumb. I guess what bothers me about the new Daisy Miller is that Winterbourne wins in the end, and that dude should fucking get it. Not that he gets it in James’s version, exactly, but he sure doesn’t get the girl. Wait, let’s back up.

Definite spoilers ahead. 

In James’s version of Daisy Miller, a boring cipherous New Englander named Winterbourne meets the lush and lusty daughter of American industrialists in Geneva. They have a boring and cipherous semi-courtship, until they decamp singly to Italy. She falls in with Italians (gasp!), with whom she is either having sex, or having the socially disastrous appearance of sex. (Same/same.) Winterbourne is a dick and a bro about the whole thing; Daisy delivers some speeches about freedom (O, America); then she dies because sluts always die of the fever. The story reads as this weird superimposition of New York Belle Epoque morality, where the girl gets it because she’s a slut and/or the wrong class (same/same), and a criticism of that, because the industrialist son who oversees this tragedy is a drag and a buzzkill. (Should we be outside? Should you even be talking to me? Omg, this is all soooo informal; that’s hot but I’m scared.) You want to fling yourself at Italian men at the end, because godamn is society cold and cruel. 

In the lush & lusty version, Daisy delivers her speeches, and instead of Winterbourne magically not be the worst (which he’s pretty much been in all the Henry James parts of the story) he discovers his love for her and rescues her from fucking Italians. (I mean “fucking” to mean “having sex with”, not as an intensifier, to be clear.) They make out and she’s cured of the Roman Fever, the end. Oh, also, her mom has a lot of buttsecks with the butler. I don’t really have a problem with that either, other than the usual squeamishness about, like, fucking the staff. But, you know, this is fine work if you can get it.

Winterbourne and Daisy getting together is the kind of end that makes me feel icky in my tummy. Sure, in the original, Winterbourne is an officious dick and Daisy a sheltered fool, but their ugly ends (while completely incommensurate) taught me something about rigid, boring, horrid class systems based on the finest of gradations. While I’m fine with Daisy surviving the usual Romantic illness that overtakes all fallen women since Victoria took the throne (at least), I am mos def not okay with Winterbourne being treated like some kind of romantic hero. Fuuuuck that guy; he is the embodiment of mediocre conventionality. Team Daisy. 

This seems an altogether different kind of American social message to have Winterbourne win out against his girl fucking Italians. Instead of some quaint 19th century examination of the grasping newly middle class tripping over its inborn lusts in front of the more second generation moneyed asshole, we have the second generation moneyed asshole being redeemed by the quaint notion of love erasing all impediments, even the bone-deep character ones. Daisy opens her legs and her heart, and Winterbourne is tugged dickward towards his inevitable romantic emanation. (I love you. Daisy, and your fucking of Italians in the square is simply performance to my voyeurism. What happiness, etc.) It’s a petty, priapic kind of love, one where romantic love brutally wins over literally everything else.

Everyone forgets that Romeo and Juliet were the exact same damn thing, and that their thwarted romance had nothing to do with class or race or anything. It is the narcissism of small differences: that the more similar two people are, the more they are likely to focus on the points of divergence, sometimes to animosity. (Which explains things like, say, the conflict in Northern Ireland, which to outsiders looks like an pointless ginger fight.) R & J would have cemented a dynasty had they had text messaging, and I gotta say, that’s not a play I want to see. It would be gross to watch two rich, white assholes get together, and it’s a damn good thing they died. So too, in the updated Daisy Miller. Daisy survives Winterbourne’s bourgie morality so they can canoodle, pretty much destroying all actual criticism of James’s social milieu. I really haven’t got a lot of time for this, but then I also admit I’m a vicious crank. Someone has got to die to prove the situation serious. All the unintended consequences to the shifts in Daisy make it kind of a bummer.

I also admit I’ve entirely overthought just about everything. Lighten up! It’s just a bit of fun! And look, I know. And I did have some fun, mostly because of the dizzying whiplash of stewing in James’s page-long sentences, and then being treated to rapid fire anal sex scenes. There’s something charming about how silly the whole prospect is, which is why I undertook this at all. Brontës and Austen make sense to me to graft in some love and zombies, but James? Is there, like, wild & wanton versions of Melville? Ethan Frome? They’re both stories with thick erotic subtexts, and even some unrequited love! (If only that big white Dick would put out, sigh.) It takes stones to take on James with a project this goofy, and I do earnestly applaud the effort. You’d never get me to set my prose style against James’; no fucking way.

And so, to move on after far too much ado, a quick google unearthed for me the latter day adventures of Dorian Gray. Unlike Miss Daisy, Wilde Passions of Dorian Gray is not a mash-up, but a continuation. Szereto rewrites the very end of Dorian Gray (the only novel Wilde ever wrote), rescuing Dorian from death by his own hand, and recounting the plot of Wilde’s novel though flashback and reference. Dorian bottoms through the next century or so, moving from various literary and/or exotic locales: Paris in the beginning, where he runs with Hemingway and the Fitzgeralds (though why they are never named confuses me); on to Marrakesh, where he enacts an ooky Orientalism; then to South America, where he tempts the faithful, and finally ending in New Orleans in an unconvincing redemption of sorts. With vampires.

While the wild & wanton “Daisy Miller” feels like a goof or a lark — hey, let’s stitch some fuckery into Henry James! That’s hi-larious! — I get the distinct impression that Wilde Passions is rather serious. Wilde Passions is not simple stroke material, but an earnest grappling with the ambiguous messages of Dorian Gray. This is odd, really, because Wilde, as you may be aware, was one of the funniest dudes ever, and the shift in tone is notable. I scanned a little of the original Dorian Gray, and shit, yo, is that man droll. At least Wilde Passions doesn’t have the source material cheek to jowl with the continuation, because that would be ruinous. As it stands, the different tone is not distracting, and trying to write like Oscar Wilde, one of the great comic writers, is probably doomed anyway.

So, I guess what I want to talk about is the erotic, and sex writing more generally. Sex writing is one of those things that is more variegated that it would appear from the snickering. It’s probably harder to pull off than a fight scene, which I would say is damned difficult to do well, because even just the writer’s choices for body terminology can turn a reader off. I know I have the words I cannot take seriously in a sexual context, which is not the same for “arm” or “leg” or “knife”. The verb “to lave” doesn’t get much play beyond sex writing, and feels both clinical and euphemistic to me. I’d much prefer cunts and cocks to honey pots and manroots, but I know many readers of sex writing, almost ironically, find these terms far too aggressive or smutty or something. 

It seems to me we’ve ceded sex writing to romance novels, and I don’t mean this to be an indictment of romance novels, but an indictment of literary fiction. Most of the best sex writing I’ve read has been in a romance novel, because that’s where sex writing occurs most often. But romance novels generally present a very, very narrow slice of the stunning variety of human sexuality. I’m not just talking about kinks or whatnot, I’m talking about how it’s generally middle class white women knocking boots with middle class white men, all between the ages of 25-35. The sex is going to be good, mind-blowing even, and no one has tired, married sex to get it over with. I’m not saying romance novels should start depicting that, necessary, though some older, less white folk would be greatly appreciated. I get that they’re wish fulfillment narratives. But it’s notable to me, for example, how many people shit the bed over the tampon scene in Fifty Shades of Grey, wherein dude removes her tampon before banging her, when, right now, literally thousands of people are having sex on the rag. Tens of thousands. It’s such a mundane, everyday detail to freak out over. Romance novel sex is often weirdly prissy.

But it’s dreadfully hard to find sex in literary fiction, and when you do, it’s often just painfully bad. The British literary magazine Literary Review does a Bad Sex in Fiction prize every year, and the esteemed and prized writers who make the list make one wince. From Ben Okri, a Booker prize winner, and the Bad Sex in Fiction winner for 2014:

“Adrift on warm currents, no longer of this world, she became aware of him gliding into her. He loved her with gentleness and strength, stroking her neck, praising her face with his hands, till she was broken up and began a low rhythmic wail … The universe was in her and with each movement it unfolded to her. Somewhere in the night a stray rocket went off.”

 I mean, really. This is what sex would be like on Monty Python, the bombs bursting on air and all that. I can think of some really cringy sex scenes from literary novels, with this just terrible mix of platitudes and overwrought metaphors. And this is of course when there is any sex writing at all, this vital component of many relationships simply elided. 

The sex — and there is a lot of it — in Wilde Passions cuts a weird middle distance. It’s not explicit enough to be stroke material — it’s not erotica — but then it’s too omnipresent to be truly literary. Dorian enacts just a host of transgressions in his quest for hedonistic sensuality and fading youthful beauty, like he does in Wilde’s novel. He ruins a Marrakeshi prostitute boy with shame and drink; he seduces a monk, which leads to the monk’s suicide. He brutalizes and murders women in New Orleans. But, here’s the thing: I just kinda didn’t get why.

Wilde somewhat famously added a preface to Dorian Gray after Victorian critics got all up in arms about its “sham morality”. You’re just writing smut with the lamest of censures tacked on the end, they said, to which Wilde replied: all art is quite useless. Morality or immorality has no place in the process of creating beauty. Art is a not a tool — it should not have a use — or it is not art. I can’t say I agree, but then I also understand where he’s coming from, and why he’s putting it so starkly. He goes to explore a life decoupled from consequence, driven by an amoral worldview, and then a bunch of howling censors accuse him of corrupting babies. Fuck you, I’m not making tools for your morality. Make them your damn self. 

Continuing on Gray’s amoral quest, after removing what you could even consider a moral, is an interesting experiment, honestly, but I have some reservations about how successful this is. His transgressions are all sexual in nature, and I begin to weary of the fuckery. Why can we not change up his violations of the social contract with, say, a Ponzi scheme or selling cancer cures made of chicken bones? I guess what I’m saying is it seems a failure of imagination to cast all his amorality in terms of the bedroom. He even killed a dude directly in Wilde’s tale. Sure, you could argue that it’s the culture around Dorian which casts his homosexual sex acts as villainous, but, as a first person narrative, that doesn’t really work. He’s pretty gleeful about the ways he ruins people through buggery, and, ultimately, it reads a little like, omg, the homosexual agenda! I don’t think that’s the intent, not at all, but it can be read out of the text pretty easily. 

But, my disquiet aside, Szereto is clearly grappling with something here, something real. And let’s put my disquiet back into it: Wilde Passions invoked for me the same brutal, chilly eroticism of mid-century fiction by women — stuff like The Story of O and Ice by Anna Kavan — and that shit frays me. She takes this odd, amoral remnant from the most squeamish of times, Victoriana, and then runs him like a VHS tape on fast forward. Wilde Passions ends somewhere in Anne Rice’s vampire eroticism, all kudzu and rot, which would be relevant 20 years ago but feels weirdly antique now. All of it feels antique: the Fitzgeralds, the Orientalism, the Thomas Mann inflected monastery, New Orleans before Katrina. Hell, maybe this takes place after Katrina, but that wouldn’t rightly be the point.

On some level, Wilde Passions is a catalog of the literary erotic, and the ways it doesn’t work are indictments of the form. The erotic in literature is built partially on shame, and shame is a sad, lonely, and conservative beast, more worried about body parts than injustice, more worried about degradation than violation. So Dorian’s burgeoning, transformative love for a girl he both brutalized and terrorized is part and parcel of the romantic narrative: love is redemptive, and requires no agency in its actors. You will be an ideal person whether you like it or not. You are simply a player in someone else’s story. Once again, love brutally wins over literally everything else, only this time, you’re not supposed to see that as a good thing. God help us all.

It’s intensely clever the way Szereto removes the Victorian “moral”, weak though it is, and then runs Gray’s amoral sensation seeking through changing literary erotic landscapes. She then ends with a modern “moral”, which looks just a weak as the Victorian. You rarely notice how blinkered the idea that romantic love is a moral agent, but boy can you see it here. Wilde Passions was a very pleasant surprise for me, an essay on sex writing and morality which is deeply considered. Who knew?

Shades of Milk and Honey: Diversions

I haven’t had a lot of luck with Austen retellings, not that I’ve given them much energy. I’ve given half-heart to some zombie stitching, with ok to terrible results; I have avoided smut recastings; I have thrown within pages various contemporary takes, but loved a couple too. So, when I say I enjoyed this slender Austen-riff, I am actually saying something. However – and you knew this however was coming – I can’t say Shades of Milk and Honey by Mary Robinette Kowal is more than a diversion: amiable enough, but evaporating like bubbles.

My husband and I went out to lunch today and got into a big argument about fanfiction. He was disparaging something for being fanfic, and I countered: how many thousands of Shakespeare retellings have I both consumed and enjoyed? How many Greek tragedies, folktales and the like? There are absolutely more stories in the world than the 12 or so we get told exist in some freshman writing class by some credulous idiot, but the resonant cultural motifs are a specific bunch, even if they keep changing and morphing.

Anyway, so, we made up over the idea that it’s not so much the concept of fanfic that he had a problem with, but the fact that the fanfic that was he subject of the argument corrected none of the problems of the source material, and, in fact, introduced more than a couple more. Fifty Shades of Grey is pretty much garbage, not because it’s Twilight fanfic, but because it’s garbage. I don’t love Twilight, while I respect its resonance, but I feel like a fanfic that misses all the inherent silliness of vegetarian vampire chastity porn is a freaking disaster. Twilight works because Bella gets to marry Jesus, not Mark Zuckerberg.

And, quick aside: I’m not using the term fanfic with any rigor here, or as a knee-jerk indicator of poor quality. And, now that I think about it, the term seems to be used dismissively of women’s fiction more often than of stuff written by men, so it’s possible I’m wrong-footing this whole review by starting with a discussion of the term. Shades of Milk and Honey is not fanfic in any way. Sure, the plot probably owes to Pride and Prejudice some, but then so many plots do; it is firmly set as a trope across multiple genres. It is set in Regency England, and Austen is probably the best known chronicler of that period, but it’s not like she invented Regency England. Moreover, it’s entirely possible this owes more to something like The Scarlet Pimpernel or Georgette Heyer over Austen, so forget I ever said anything. Jfc, I need to get it together.

Jane and Melody Ellsworth are rivalrous sisters whose parents are roughly Mr & Mrs Bennet, but softer. Mrs Ellsworth still has the vapours, but Mr Ellsworth isn’t an entailed dick. Melody is pretty-but-dumb and Jane is talented-but-plain. While the world is decidedly Regency England, there is this tiny bit of magic in the mix – glamour – which is to be our shifting paranormal lens on the rigid gender divisions of that society. Glamour is understood to be a woman’s hobby – good for cosmetic reasons and not much else – but there’s a hot, grouchy male glamourist with whom Jane is secretly smitten. (Secret even from herself, but seriously dude.)

The whole concept of glamour is a ripe metaphor that unfortunately isn’t explored very deeply. It solves some issues with the Regency novel – aha, performing glamour is why all the ladies are swooning – but it has close to zero impact on Regency England or any of the characters. Everyone dismisses the wartime applications – the Napoleonic wars are unfolding, the way they do – but glamour obviously has an impact on a confusingly written dueling sequence near the end. Glamour can record conversations for crying out loud! That absolutely could be a thing with spycraft, at the very least!

I did appreciate the ways Jane and glamourist dude talked about the craft of art, and I even marked a passage in the now-lost book where glamourist dude growls at Jane for observing the ways he built a specific illusion. The ways Jane takes that to heart and tries simply to experience the illusion without a critical eye felt … felt like something about all this arguing I was doing about retellings with my husband. But, unfortunately, I admired the craft here much more than I enjoyed its heart.

Shades of Milk and Honey does a very, very good job of aping the craft of a Regency novel – it is set beautifully, with attention to detail and character. But it is not actually a Regency novel, and it lacks the snap of Austen’s often cutting observations about the culture she lived in. As a reader, I can only access that snap in Austen’s works through historical research, which makes the cuts less immediate; a joke explained is less funny than a joke that punches known knowledge. Which might be the lack in Shades of Milk and Honey: Kowal doesn’t cut anything about Regency England, which would be a weird thing to do anyway, but then she also doesn’t necessarily say anything about the here-and-now?

I don’t actually appreciate the dichotomy between smart-but-plain and pretty-but-dumb all that much, because I think it’s a boring and unrealistic binary, so I think the expression here of that tension is unrewarding. And unrewarding in a way that Austen never hits. Elizabeth is not as beautiful as her sister Jane, but that’s not really a thing, and, in general, Austen avoids all but the tersest of physical descriptions. Elizabeth is said to have fine eyes and dark hair and not much else. So I’m in a place where novels written 200 years ago felt more harshly critical of their societies than ones written in the last decade, which is the weirdest.

The Nebula nominee I read just previous to this, Ironskin, also recasts the woman-penned 19th Century novel Jane Eyre as to be about looks and not much else, and I wonder what is up with this contemporary attention to the superficial to the exclusion of, well, anything else.  Shades of Milk and Honey is a well written novel, unlike Ironskin, but it is still strange that these novels are being lauded as genre stand-outs. Admitting, of course, that I haven’t actually read the sequel here, which is the one up against Ironskin. Still, it is an oddment that glamour is more ornament than architecture, more diversion than statement. I enjoyed being diverted, but I can’t say much else about it.

Crossed fingers for Glamour in Glass, but…

Dawn of the Truly Dreadful

I heard this story once from a friend of mine – I make no claims to its veracity – about a guy who ghost-wrote an autobiography for some minor Playboy bunny/starlet. It was a good gig for a struggling writer: he spent some weeks organizing the depressingly non-sordid details of a woman’s life that culminated in being publicly nekkid, banged out a manuscript (sorry, is this a pun?), and then was paid for the time and bother. The real bummer was that at roughly the same time, the book that he’d written – his real baby, the one he birthed laboriously with the usual screaming, love and bleeding that goes along with writing something important to you – was published to polite obscurity, and then vanished into a more complete obscurity. There were a few reviews, not negative ones, just indifferent, which has its own kind of soul-killing burn. Reviews of the nekkid memoir were good; reviewers were pleasantly surprised that Ms. Bunny seemed intelligent and funny. Maybe not needless to say, the intelligence and humor were solely the addition of the ghost-writer. “Huh,” everyone said. “I guess she’s not the complete idiot we took her for. Weird.” Cue writerly melt-down, drinking, etc. 

So now when I start in on some ad hominem attacks on Mr. Hockensmith’s book, which I plan to do, with feeling, please understand that I have some empathy towards that broken wreck of a writer he must be, gibbering as he takes long pulls on a bottle of Jack, editing his unfinished masterpiece that will vanish without a trace while idiot readers such as myself buy shit like Pride and Prejudice and Zombies: Dawn of the Dreadfuls. I am culpable in the vicious cycle that rewards publishers for pumping out garbage with good titles, great covers, and an originally clever idea that can be endlessly mimeographed into a purple-blue stew of endlessly derivative works. Android Karenina? Oh yes. Jane Slayre? Sign me the heck right up.

Steve Hockensmith is a robot. No, strike that, he’s a committee of robots commissioned by the marketing department of Quirk books for the purposes of penning (keyboarding? coding?) a quick and dirty cash-in to the unexpected success of Pride and Prejudice and Zombies. I liked Pride and Prejudice and Zombies – what? It was fine, really, and my estimation of it has improved upon reading its prequel. Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, for all its faults, didn’t betray its source materials. Seth Grahame-Smith, the author, clearly had read Austen’s work, and read it enough to stitch in some zombie mayhem in places where zombie mayhem might be appropriate. (Although, really, the title should have read Pride and Prejudice and Ninjas because the best scenes – like Lizzie and Lady Catherine de Bough having a ninja throw-down – centered on the martial arts. Still, whatever, he meant no disrespect. 

Mr Hockensmith has never read Pride and Prejudice. He rented the BBC adaption which he watched on mute while talking on the phone. I’m not impugning this activity; descriptions of doing this very thing made Bridget Jones’s Diarysuch an enjoyable read. I could, and at length, bitch about all of the violations and betrayals of Austen’s characters and historical facts in Dawn of the Dreadfuls, but Elizabeth has already beaten me to the punch. So, I’m here today, my friends, to bitch about the zombies. As some of you may be aware, I have a thing for zombies. Even though I should know better, I bolt down all kinds of trashy crap just because it has some undead lumbering around in it. Om nom nom, as the kids say. 

And even though I just went through this big apology for buying and reading trash fiction, I don’t really feel all that bad about it, and I think maybe writing good trash is harder than it looks. Certainly there’s no magic formula in the trash department, just like there isn’t for writing non-trash, but I think probably writers should at least seem like they give a crap. Writers should have the tiniest respect for the readers for whom the $10 they shell out in the store is the smallest price they pay – the big cost in in the time they invest. Even in my skimmiest of readings, I’m going to give a book 2 hours of my freaking life. I’m reading this trash because I like both Austen and zombies, and when he disrespects both of those things, he disrespects me as a reader. 

Mr. Hockensmith never figures out where his zombies are coming from, how they work, and most importantly, what they mean, which I’ll go off about later. So, okay, the dead rise, just randomly, because it’s warm? Fine. Then why is it also a contagion that can be passed on by a bite? And then why can you amputate the bitten limb and not zombify? So, one of those magical contagions that doesn’t enter the bloodstream? This is getting into not-fine territory for me. I don’t mind magic, really I don’t. Pretty much any explanation of zombies is going to resolve down into magic because of physics and reality. But for crying out loud, have a little sense of craft, man. 

But really, zombies are incidental, an excuse for a sex farce that includes things like Mrs. Bennet being mistaken by her daughters as a zombie when she goes scritch-scratching on the doors of Mr.Oscar Bennet’s room so he can impregnate her with a male heir. There are more nut shots in this book than zombie kills. Which brings me to my next complaint: there are many conventions of zombie fiction, and sex farce is usually a pretty low one on the list. There’s some good zombedies, but they, like the serious stuff, tend to rely on gross-out and gore over nut-shots and a bit with a dog. (This is why I rather liked Queen Victoria: Demon Hunter– the author there respected the gross.) I’m not saying zombie stuff should be sexless, but it’s less slap-and-tickle and more icky sex. 

So, fail on zombie mechanics and fail on zombie genre sensibilities. Now how about the zombie-as-metaphor? I don’t expect Mr. Hockensmith to devote his valuable time nurturing an obsession with the undead. I don’t expect him to write a treatise about how the zombies have their beginnings in colonial moral queasiness about the Caribbean slave-island nightmares they created and maintained – the original zombies were, after all, controlled by a Voodoo Priest, whose black skin, semi-Catholic idolatry, and ability to marshal people who lacked agency, autonomy and souls (read: slaves) struck to the heart of (British) colonialist fears. Slave uprising in Haiti, anyone? When Romero came along and skinned this rabbit good in Night of the Living Dead, he repurposes the Big Black Bad into the hero Ben, whose calmness, rationality, and authority allow him to survive the Marxist zombie uprising only to get cut down and hauled off by good ole boys. The revolution may be televised, but it’s an edited version. 

So okay, maybe Mansfield Park, with the Bertram family and their ominous-sounding “holdings” in Antigua, moral rot, and vapidity would have been a better fit for this kind of mash-up. Fanny Price, the heroine of Mansfield Park, is in some ways the perfect picture of a British Regency abolitionist – she’s extremely principled to the point of being a moralizing prig, but she’s developed those principles by being raised by a family who, it is coyly hinted, were slavers, who abused her almost casually, because their money, their lands, their status is built out of human cargo (which still stands as one of the most tortured euphemisms ever.) Still though, something could be said for the Bennets as a rising middle-class, mocked by the wealthy and titled for their familial relations who are *gasp* in trade, but hamstrung by both an entitlement system and their own spendthrift ways – Mr. Bennett – whose first name is anything but freaking Oscar, I might add – does say at some point in the real P & P that the girls wouldn’t need to fling themselves at any passing man if he’d been a little more careful with his finances. Grr, arg, brains. 

Anyway, what am I on about? Oh, yes, zombies. Zombies are about class, and race, and the hard economics that there are always more, and many more, have-nots than haves. Hockensmith seems to get this for maybe five seconds when he starts into a sub-plot where the Bennets lose face for training to fight the zombie hordes and then it gets them into hot water socially – maybe we’ll get into how the middle class often pretends to itself to have the problems of the leisure classes – you don’t think inheritance laws and “death taxes” have anything to do with you, do you? because they don’t – while surreptitiously working for a living. (Actually, there’s some cool stuff about law and the undead in Ian McDonald‘s Terminal Cafe.) But instead, some dumb plan to use some caricatured tail-chasing Baron to increase their standing is enacted, complete with more sex farce & nut shots. *possible spoiler if you still care* Cue Lady Catherine riding in on her white horse – I’m not making this up – and irritatedly saving Hertfordshire. Noblesse oblige & zombies, you can shove yourself up your own keyster. 

Fail, fail, fail. I want to be entirely clear: I’m not opposed to trash fiction. I was fully on board to eat some brains and gross-out and squeal. All the stuff about slave uprisings and economics that I went on about would have been a bonus, but I wasn’t hoping for that. Not everyone can be John Carpenter, tossing off garbage with biting social commentary. And apparently not everyone can be Seth Grahame-Smith either, and by everyone I mean Steve Hockensmith. I’ve been trying not too cuss to much in this review, but in sum, fuck this.